Maple Trying to solve an equation but get weird solution with new variable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a specific equation in Maple for the variable gamma(s). The user initially confuses gamma with sigma in their equation setup, which they acknowledge and plan to correct. Despite this, they continue to struggle with obtaining a valid solution and express frustration over receiving unexpected results, including a new variable (_z) in the output. Attempts to use WolframAlpha for solving the equation also result in errors, specifically a "Standard computation time exceeded" message, even during a trial period. The user seeks further assistance in generating an equation to determine sigma(s) effectively.
dscot
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to solve this equation inside of Maple:
http://screencast.com/t/EeqzLhxS for gamma(s)

I assign variables to each of the values like this:http://screencast.com/t/DBLS8BH6R

When I try to solve I get this weird answer with a new _z variable: http://screencast.com/t/qVHp7xVRFUq

Can anyone see what I've done wrong, I'm really going crazy with this one :)

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first screen capture with the formula contains no gammas that I can see. I see a couple of sigmas.
 
Sorry SteamKing, you are correct. I think I've mixed both the symbols up during my which I'll be sure to fix :)

My problem still holds true, would you have any thoughts on that?

Thanks =)
 
Sorry guys, still not had any luck with this.

I've also tried wolframAlpha with this: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+a=+((b^0.5+/+c^0.5)+*+exp(-d*(c-b)^2))+for+b

( I just separated the terms in order, into a,b,c,d)

But get this error: Standard computation time exceeded..

I got a similar error even with the 14 day pro trial.

I'm not sure what else to try all I'm trying to do is to generate an equation to work out sigma(s)?

Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Back
Top