Trying to understand magnetic pump

  • Thread starter Thread starter sf2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetic Pump
AI Thread Summary
Magnetic pumps utilize the Lorentz force to move conductive liquids like molten sodium without moving parts. The process involves a current flowing through the liquid and a magnetic field applied perpendicular to that current, generating a force that propels the liquid. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the necessity of two magnetic fields for effective movement, as one field is thought to create a downward force while the other directs the flow along the pipe. However, it's clarified that only one current and one magnetic field are needed to create movement, and the perpendicular nature of the forces is key to understanding the operation. Ultimately, the interaction of these forces allows for the effective transport of the liquid metal in the pump system.
sf2k
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm confused how a magnetic pump works as described in my text. I'll quote:

"""Liquid metals, such as the molten sodium used in certain nuclear reactors, can be moved through pipes using an electromagnetic pump that has no moving parts. If the metal has to be moved in a pipe that is orientated north-south, for example, a large electric current can be sent across the pipe --east to west perhaps. Then, if a strong magnetic field is directed downward through the same section of pipe, the current-carrying metal will be forced to move southward"""

This appears to be two magnetic fields, one crossing the pipe also in a horizontal plane to the current, and the other magnetic field directed downward perpendicular to the pipe direction. But I don't understand why you need two.

My understanding so far:

First Field: If the current is across the pipe east to west, right to left, and the magnetic fields are circular moving north-south along the pipe, the force is already downwards in a vertical sense and not down the pipe.

Second Field: A second field vertically downward apparently moves the molten sodium if the force is also southward.

I thought that magnetic fields did not interfere with charge, so I'm not following how the molten sodium itself actually moves at all. Why does this need two magnetic fields?

Thanks for any understanding.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sf2k-
The force is called the Lorentz force. The force F is the vector cross product of the current I and the magnetic field B.

F = I x B

The force is perpenducular to the plane containing the current and the magnetic field.
Here is a nice website with a visual java applet. Click on the knife switch to make it close and open:

http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/java/lorentzforce/index.html

Bob S
 
Last edited:
First off thanks for the link and a very nice reply!

Ok, so in one case the first magnetic field has a Lorentz force vertically down and the other Lorentz force is in the plane of direction to move the molten sodium. Where I'm not following is why there needs to be two fields to move the sodium? And how can it move at all if there are two forces in perpendicular to each other?
 
sf2k said:
First off thanks for the link and a very nice reply!

Ok, so in one case the first magnetic field has a Lorentz force vertically down and the other Lorentz force is in the plane of direction to move the molten sodium. Where I'm not following is why there needs to be two fields to move the sodium? And how can it move at all if there are two forces in perpendicular to each other?
The "magic" in the Lorentz force is that the force is perpendicular to the plane in which both the current and magnetic field vectors lie. The current and magnetic field vectors cannot be parallel. Only the mutually perpendicular component of B and I is important (vector cross product). You need only one current and one magnetic field to create a force. By reversing the current, you can reverse the direction of the force.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
yes thank you. I"m sorry if I'm not clear.

I know that both the current and the magnetic field are in the same plane but 90 degrees apart while the force is perpendicular 90 degrees to their plane. like x,y, and z.

however the magnetic pump needs two such magnetic fields and not one. With only one's force used to move the molten sodium. So it's really an issue of understanding the forces that move the sodium along and why I need two magnetic fields to accomplish this in a magnetic pump.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top