Ttorque angular acceleration units check

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a hypothetical wheel with a moment of inertia of 1 lb*ft² when a torque of 1 ft/lb is applied for 1 second. Participants emphasize the importance of distinguishing between pound-mass and pound-force in U.S. customary units. The initial condition of the wheel being at rest is confirmed, and it is noted that this affects the calculations. The conversation highlights the need to determine the resulting acceleration from the applied force. Ultimately, the participants seek clarity on whether the wheel achieves a rotation of 1 r.p.s. after the torque is applied.
mstram
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Given :

A (hypothetical) wheel with a m.o.i. of 1 lb*ft^2

Radius of wheel = 1.9099 inches, therefore circumference of wheel = 1 foot

The wheel is at rest, i.e. zero rotation speed.

A torque of 1 ft/lb is applied for 1 second

Is the result a rotation of 1 r.p.s. (60 r.p.m.) ?

thx
Mike
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mstram said:
Given :

A (hypothetical) wheel with a m.o.i. of 1 lb*ft^2

Radius of wheel = 1.9099 inches, therefore circumference of wheel = 1 foot

A torque of 1 ft/lb is applied for 1 second

Is the result a rotation of 1 r.p.s. (60 r.p.m.) ?

thx
Mike
If you are working in the system of U.S. customary units then you should carefully distinguish between pound-mass and pound-force. I see at least two problems with your result. Let's start with the easier one: What acceleration is produced when one pound force acts on one pound mass?
 
Sorry, I meant to write the initial rotation of the wheel is zero (at rest).

Does that make a difference ?
 
mstram said:
Sorry, I meant to write the initial rotation of the wheel is zero (at rest).
Does that make a difference ?
It would make a difference. But It seemed clear that we were to assume a start from rest anyway.

Again, what acceleration would you expect from a one pound mass subject to a one pound force?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top