Turning summations into integrals in the thermodynamic limit

Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Hi. I'm reading a solution to a problem concerning a gas of photons. In the solution, the energy of the gas is given as

E=2\sum_{\vec{k}} \frac{\displaystyle \epsilon_{\vec{k}}}{\displaystyle \exp[\beta\epsilon_{\vec{k}}]+1}


where \epsilon_{\vec{k}} is one photon's energy. It is said then that in the thermodynamic limit we have

\sum_{\vec{k}} \rightarrow \frac{\displaystyle V}{\displaystyle (2\pi)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\,4\pi\,k^{2}dkCould you explain how is this change from the summation to the integral is done?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll just do the 1D case for simplicity. In a finite 1D box with periodic BCs, the momentum k is really defined as
<br /> k = k(n) = \frac{2 \pi n}{L}<br />
where n runs over all of the integers. Then the sum is really over these integers
<br /> \sum_{k} f(k) = \sum_{n = \infty}^{\infty} f(k(n))<br />
The thermodynamic limit can be though of as approximating this sum as an integral
<br /> \sum_{n = \infty}^{\infty} f(k(n)) \rightarrow \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dn f(k(n))<br />
However, since k has a more natural physical interpretation, we prefer to change variables. Then using the fact that dn = \frac{L}{2 \pi} dk, we obtain
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dn f(k(n)) = \frac{L}{2 \pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dk f(k)<br />
In d dimensions, the factor is V/(2 \pi)^d instead.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top