Twin turbo intercooler pipe merge using air ejector design

  • Thread starter Thread starter V8KILR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Design Pipe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting a turbo system from single to sequential twin turbos, highlighting the challenge of preventing reverse airflow from the first turbo to the second. The proposed solution is to use an air ejector design in the intercooler pipe to eliminate the need for a swing check valve, which would normally prevent backflow. The air ejector aims to mix high-pressure air from the first turbo with atmospheric air in the second turbo's pipe, creating forward velocity and reducing the chance of reverse flow. The poster seeks mathematical validation for this design to ensure effective mixing and airflow management. Additionally, suggestions for manufacturers of charge air coolers were provided to assist in the project.
V8KILR
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm converting my turbo system from a single turbo to a sequential twin turbo system. Where the two turbos intercooler pipes join, the flow from the first turbo to spool can easily reverse back through the second turbo to spool, unless you have a one way valve like a swing check valve to stop this happening.

What I would like to do is eliminate the swing check valve by using an air ejector design with the first turbo's intercooler pipe to stop the flow reversing back through the second turbo's intercooler pipe. Here is a diagram I have done.

pipes.jpg


Could this design work such that at all stages of both turbos boost from vacuum to full boost, there would be no flow backwards to the second turbo?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Google "twin turbo merger" and you will see plenty of smooth transitions into the throttle/carb. If you have similar turbos being fed by equal banks of exhaust the rest of it "will work itself out".

MergePipe003_zpsf501868d.jpg


580879700_A7anx-M.jpg
 
This is a sequential twin turbo setup I am doing which means one turbo makes boost first while the other one is making no boost. The pic you show is one of the better designs, but I still don't think that I can merge the intercooler pipes like your pic shows otherwise the boost from the first turbo will still partly flow back out the second turbo (as it is making no flow or boost) instead of it all going out through the intercooler. This is because the flow path back out through the second turbo presents less resistance to the first turbos boosted air then going through the intercooler does.

What the air ejector method should do is turbulently mix the air from the first turbo (which is at high speed and pressure) with the atmospheric pressure air in the second turbo intercooler pipe. This mixing should impart forward velocity to the second turbos static air resulting in it also moving towards the intercooler, albeit at a slower speed. The more mixing that occurs, the better this idea will work and the less chance that any air will flow backwards out the second turbo.

That's why I'm hoping someone with more maths skills then me can help work out (or point me in the right direction) if my idea of using an air ejector design for the pipe merging will achieve maximum mixing of the air and result in no air ever flowing backwards out the second turbo.
 
Last edited:
A check valve should work for the intake.
draw_disc_check_valve.jpg



This should solve the exhaust part.
power_cut_out_trimmed.jpg
 
The EGCV (exhaust gas control valve) design I like the best is this one as it is boost activated, but unfortunately they are out of stock at the moment.

ATP-ACS-010_450.jpg


The intake check valve design I like the best is this one. It is a swing check valve so should have very little flow resistance.

seq9.jpg


I'd still like to be able to have the intercooler pipe merging done so that there is no need for the swing check valve though, and I still think that the air ejector design should be able to achieve that.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

I am not sure if this will help at all but there is a company that manufacture diesel engine charge air coolers, you should try Vestas aircoil A/S in Denmark (www.vestas-aircoil.com)
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top