Twins Separated at Birth: Do Ages Match?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Match
the_kid
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Twins are separated at birth on earth. Twin B travels in a straight line back and forth at a velocity, V. According to twin A, who stays on earth, twin B travels away for 10 years, and then back toward Earth for ten years.

They send light signals to each other at every birthday each one celebrates. When do they receive another's signals and does each count agree with their ages upon return?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Event 1: A emits a pulse
Event 2: Y receives the pulse

Event 1, in earth-frame: (t_{1}, 0)
Event 1, in moving frame of B: (t^{'}_{1}, -Vt_{1})

Event 2, in earth-frame: (t_{2}, Vt_{2})
Event 2, in moving frame of B: (t^{'}_{2}, 0)

This gives me both events in each coordinate system. They can be related by the expression c=\frac{x_{2}}{t_{2}-t_{1}}. After substituting x_{2}=Vt_{2} and simplifying, we have t_{2}=\frac{ct_{1}}{c-V}. This gives the relationship in the earth-frame.

Now how do I get the relationship in the moving frame?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get an understanding of what is happening by constructing the space-time diagram. Try this description.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top