What is the Minimum Force to Move Two Connected Bars on a Frictional Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cordyceps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Physics
AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum force required to move two connected bars on a frictional surface, the approach of treating the masses as a single unit is incorrect. Instead, the extension of the spring must be calculated to initiate movement of the second bar, which is equal to the friction force acting on it, m2gk. The work-energy theorem should be applied, considering the work done on the spring and against friction. The spring constant will not affect the final expression for the force. This method leads to the correct calculation of the minimum force needed.
cordyceps
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two bars of masses m1 and m2 connected by a non-deformed light spring rest on a horizontal plane. The coefficient of friction between the bars and the surface is equal to k. What minimum constant force has to be applied in the horizontal direction to the bar of mass m1 in order to shift the other bar?

Homework Equations


Friction = mgk

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the spring transfers the force applied to m1, I assumed I could treat the two masses as a single mass m1+m2. Thus the minimum force required is (m1+m2)gk.
This is the wrong answer- but I don't know what I did wrong. Any suggestions? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cordyceps said:

Homework Statement


Two bars of masses m1 and m2 connected by a non-deformed light spring rest on a horizontal plane. The coefficient of friction between the bars and the surface is equal to k. What minimum constant force has to be applied in the horizontal direction to the bar of mass m1 in order to shift the other bar?


Homework Equations


Friction = mgk


The Attempt at a Solution


Since the spring transfers the force applied to m1, I assumed I could treat the two masses as a single mass m1+m2. Thus the minimum force required is (m1+m2)gk.
This is the wrong answer- but I don't know what I did wrong. Any suggestions? Thanks.

Dont consider m1 and m2 as a single mass.
First find out how much extension you need in the spring in order that the second bar just starts moving.
Then apply the work energy theorem. The force would be minimum when m1 does not acquire any kinetic energy in the process.
 
Isn't the extension needed in the spring in order to just move the 2nd bar equal to the friction of the second bar, m2gk?
 
cordyceps said:
Isn't the extension needed in the spring in order to just move the 2nd bar equal to the friction of the second bar, m2gk?

Yes, that's right.
The extension x required= (km2g)/c
c is assumed to be the spring constant

Notice that the bar2 is just about to move, it hasn't started moving.

And the work done by the constant force=the work done on the spring+the work done against friction in moving the 1st block
Tell me if you get you answer now.

The spring constant c will automatically vanish in the expression. Give it a try :D

regards,
Ritwik
 
So Fx= (1/2)c(x^2) + m1gkx
F= (1/2)cx + m1gk
F= (1/2)m2gk + m1gk
Wow. Thanks a bunch!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top