Two blocks on a third block which is split into two ramps

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks on frictionless slopes of a larger block, which is on a horizontal surface. Participants are analyzing forces acting on the blocks and the implications of their motion and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss free body diagrams (FBDs) and the role of normal forces. Questions arise regarding the independence of the solution from these forces and the implications of the larger block's motion. There is exploration of how horizontal acceleration affects the forces on the smaller blocks.

Discussion Status

Several participants are seeking clarification on the relationships between forces and accelerations, particularly regarding the concept of virtual inertial forces and how they relate to normal forces. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which the smaller blocks do not slide down the slopes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over specific elements of the free body diagrams and the assumptions being made about the system's motion. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the interpretation of forces and accelerations involved.

burian
Messages
64
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Two cubes of masses ##m_1## and ##m_2## be on two frictionless slopes of block A which rests on a horizontal table. The cubes are connected by string which passes over a pulley as shown in the figure. To what horizontal acceleration f should the whole system ( that is blocks and cubes) be subjected so that the cubes do not slide down the planes. What is the tension of the string in this situation?
Relevant Equations
[tex] N_{m_1} \sin \alpha - T \cos \alpha = m_1 f \\
T \sin \alpha + N_{m_1} \cos \alpha = m_1 g [\tex]
So, for this question first I did a free body diagram in the perpendicular x-y axes, and, I got some equations with the normals, but the answer is independent of normal forces. So, I'm not sure how to eliminate the two normals. Further I find it quite weird that big block-A doesn't come into the picture, why is this? I have attached pics of my work
20200805_231937.jpg
20200805_204203.jpg


20200805_232331.jpg


Free body analysis + Final equation I got boxed in blue+ reference picture

Thanks for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
burian said:
Homework Statement:: Two cubes of masses ##m_1## and ##m_2## be on two frictionless slopes of block A which rests on a horizontal table.

... Further I find it quite weird that big block-A doesn't come into the picture, why is this?...
There is a net force making those two small blocks naturaly slide down that contour.
Simultaneously accelerating those masses (plus big block A at same rate) horizontally should generate an additional net force that cancells the other one.
Big block A has nothing to do with all that, except going for the ride and providing that sliding countour for our smaler blocks.
 
I do not understand your FBD. What is that arrow pointing up the slope? The letter written next to it looks like a distorted lower case y.
 
haruspex said:
I do not understand your FBD. What is that arrow pointing up the slope? The letter written next to it looks like a distorted lower case y.
Oh that's my tension 😂
 
Lnewqban said:
There is a net force making those two small blocks naturaly slide down that contour.
Simultaneously accelerating those masses (plus big block A at same rate) horizontally should generate an additional net force that cancells the other one.
Big block A has nothing to do with all that, except going for the ride and providing that sliding countour for our smaler blocks.
See this is the part I don't get, why does simultaneously accelerating generate a net force which cancels the force on small blocks?
 
burian said:
See this is the part I don't get, why does simultaneously accelerating generate a net force which cancels the force on small blocks?
There are two ways of expressing this.
We can use the reference frame of the large block, which means we have a virtual inertial force on each small block going the other way.
Or we can say that in order to produce accelerations that are equal and horizontal on the small blocks we need an acceleration of the large block so as to increase the two normal forces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
burian said:
See this is the part I don't get, why does simultaneously accelerating generate a net force which cancels the force on small blocks?
@haruspex has explained it better than I could.

Gravity → acceleration of small blocks → ##\vec F_1=(m_1+m_2)~\vec a_1##

Then, we have the question:
To what horizontal acceleration f should the whole system (that is blocks and cubes) be subjected so that the cubes do not slide down the planes?

New horizontal acceleration → Induces new additional force (hopefully of same magnitude and opposite direction, so it cancels the first one) → ##\vec F_2=(m_1+m_2)~\vec a_2##
 
haruspex said:
There are two ways of expressing this.
We can use the reference frame of the large block, which means we have a virtual inertial force on each small block going the other way.
Or we can say that in order to produce accelerations that are equal and horizontal on the small blocks we need an acceleration of the large block so as to increase the two normal forces.
What is a 'virtual inertial force'? And, how exactly does acceleration increase the normal force?
 
Lnewqban said:
@haruspex has explained it better than I could.

Gravity → acceleration of small blocks → ##\vec F_1=(m_1+m_2)~\vec a_1##

Then, we have the question:
To what horizontal acceleration f should the whole system (that is blocks and cubes) be subjected so that the cubes do not slide down the planes?

New horizontal acceleration → Induces new additional force (hopefully of same magnitude and opposite direction, so it cancels the first one) → ##\vec F_2=(m_1+m_2)~\vec a_2##
For this part, how do I finish the problem with equations I have ..or are they wrong? I get an equation relating the pseudo force stuff and normal force which big block applies on the two little blocks
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K