Two capacitors in parallel rearranged

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of two capacitors (C1=10μF and C2=40μF) connected in parallel to a 10V battery, then reconfigured by connecting their positive and negative terminals together. For part "a," the initial charge calculation is incorrect; while the voltage across capacitors in parallel is equal, the charges differ when they are disconnected from the battery. In part "b," there's confusion regarding energy changes, with a suggestion that energy must decrease due to charge redistribution, but calculations indicate an increase in potential energy. Part "c" highlights that energy changes occur due to the redistribution of charges when the capacitors are reconnected, and emphasizes the need for accurate calculations to understand these changes. The conversation stresses the importance of correctly interpreting the configuration of capacitors before proceeding with energy calculations.
haikuberryfin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical math forums, so no Homework Help Template is shown
I just had a test, and I'm wondering how to do one of the free responses on it. The first couple parts, which I'll omit, were pretty simple, but I got kind of lost toward the end.

Two Capacitors (C1=10microF C2=40microF) are connected in parallel to a 10V battery. The capacitors are then disconnected from the battery and rewired so that their positive sides are connected to the other capacitor's negative side.

a) What is the voltage drop across each capacitor?
b) Does the potential energy increase, decrease, or remain the same. If it changes, what is the percentage increase or decrease of the system?
c) Why did the capacitor system gain or lose energy if it did? Where did that energy come from or go?

For part "a," I found original Qeq. Qo = (10microF + 40microF) * 10V = 500microC;
Q1 = Q2 = 250microC;
V1 = 250microC / 10microF = 25V; V2 = 250microC / 40 microF = 6.25V

Moving onto part "b," I thought conceptually that the system would have to lose energy since charges would have to be redistributed across the plates to even out.
I then used U = Q2 / (2 * C) = 500microC2 / (2 * 8microF) = .015625J
This doesn't make sense since that is a big increase from the .0025J of the original configuration.

I treated part "c" like I did conceptually for part "b" and went with it decreasing.

If anyone could help me with this, I'd greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haikuberryfin said:
I just had a test, and I'm wondering how to do one of the free responses on it. The first couple parts, which I'll omit, were pretty simple, but I got kind of lost toward the end.

Two Capacitors (C1=10microF C2=40microF) are connected in parallel to a 10V battery. The capacitors are then disconnected from the battery and rewired so that their positive sides are connected to the other capacitor's negative side.

a) What is the voltage drop across each capacitor?
b) Does the potential energy increase, decrease, or remain the same. If it changes, what is the percentage increase or decrease of the system?
c) Why did the capacitor system gain or lose energy if it did? Where did that energy come from or go?

For part "a," I found original Qeq. Qo = (10microF + 40microF) * 10V = 500microC;
Q1 = Q2 = 250microC;

That is wrong. What is equal if two elements are connected in parallel?
 
ehild said:
That is wrong. What is equal if two elements are connected in parallel?

Connected in parallel, Voltage drops are equivalent. Aren't the capacitors in series though after the switch occurs?
 
Questin a) asks the charges before
haikuberryfin said:
Connected in parallel, Voltage drops are equivalent. Aren't the capacitors in series though after the switch occurs?
No. The charge can not leave the capacitors, it only can recombine. There will be net charge on the plates in contact. When you disconnect the capacitors they do not have equal charges. There is Q1 on one and Q2 on the other. Connecting + to -, the magnitude of the net charge on the connected plates is |Q1-Q2|. If the capacitors are connected in series, that net charge is zero.
 
haikuberryfin said:
a) What is the voltage drop across each capacitor?
b) Does the potential energy increase, decrease, or remain the same. If it changes, what is the percentage increase or decrease of the system?
c) Why did the capacitor system gain or lose energy if it did? Where did that energy come from or go?

For part "a," I found original Qeq. Qo = (10microF + 40microF) * 10V = 500microC;
Q1 = Q2 = 250microC;
V1 = 250microC / 10microF = 25V; V2 = 250microC / 40 microF = 6.25V
First, I assume the problem meant to read "The capacitors are then disconnected from the battery and rewired so that each cap's positive side is connected to the other's negative side." So they are still in parallel but one is flipped in polarity.
Assuming the above, how can there be two voltages? The caps are connected to each other directly.
You need to solve part (a) correctly before moving on to b and c.
Suggestion: rather than connecting the caps to each other directly, put a resistor between them and solve for v1(t) and v2(t), the two ends of the resistor. Then let the resistance → 0.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top