Two-Dimensional Kinematics: Weightless

  • Thread starter Thread starter r34racer01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about simulating weightlessness in a jet aircraft, participants calculated various kinematic parameters, including the time of weightlessness (62.7 seconds), horizontal distance traveled (31,575.4 meters), and maximum height above cruising altitude (4,816.11 meters). The main challenge arose in calculating the radius of curvature at the apex of the flight path, where an initial calculation yielded an incorrect result due to a unit error. A reminder to set the calculator to degrees helped resolve the issue, leading to the correct answer. The discussion highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics calculations.
r34racer01
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Early in the space program a jet aircraft was used to simulate "weightless" space flight. Beginning from a comfortable cruising altitude, assume such a craft could reach a speed of v = 590 m/s at an angle q = 31.4° above the horizontal. Subsequently the engines were used only to overcome air friction, and the plane followed a "free fall" path.

a)How long could "weightlessness" experiments be done before the plane fell back to its original altitude? t=62.7

b)How far would the plane travel horizontally during this time? x= 31575.4

c)What is the maximum height that the plane would reach above its cruising altitude?
y= 4816.11

d)What is the radius of curvature of the path at its apex?

(i.e., what is the radius of a circular path having the same velocity and acceleration as the plane at its highest point?)


Part d) is where I get stuck. The help portion says, "Use the definition of angular acceleration." So if I use a = v^2 / r and account for the horizontal velocity it should be
R = (590 cos 31.4)^2 / 9.81 = 35475.19 but apparently that's wrong. Can someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Redo the calculation. I used your numbers as you have them and did not get 35475.19. Hint: Set you calculator to "Degrees".
 
kuruman said:
Redo the calculation. I used your numbers as you have them and did not get 35475.19. Hint: Set you calculator to "Degrees".

Oh wow it was in radians, jeez I'm stupid, thanks I got the right answer now.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top