let f be a ffunction for which f(2)=-3 and f'(x)=square root of (x^2+5) if g(x)= x^2*f(x/(x-1)), what is g'(2)?
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
i am almost positive that i need to find the opposite of derivative (antiderivative?) for f'(x), so i can find f(x) and then substitute that into g(x) to find g'(x). however. I'm not sure how to do antiderivatives. i think it is something like square root of "?" +5x, but i don't know what the antideravitive of x^2 is. i would have guessed x^3, but that would yeild 3x^2 instead of x^2.
You can integrate to find f then use f(2) =-3 to find the integration constant. Then just substitute 2 in the derative of g.
#3
abbykeck
4
0
Umm... if you don't mid, could you try to explaint to me what the intergration method is. i don't think I've heard of it. either that or i have forgotten it. is it dealing with algebra or calculus?
Or, if you don't like integrating (or don't know what it is), you can just use the chain rule to write down the derivative of g and plug in x = -2.
Since you only do one derivation you will only get stuff with f(-2) and f'(-2), both of which you know.
dirk's method also works but I don't see the need to find f(x) first.
#5
abbykeck
4
0
but in order to find g(x), don't i have to find f(x)? since f(x) is in the function of g(x)? maybe that's what you were saying at the end of your explination, but i don't really understand it.
Suppose you were given h(x)=2f(x) taking the derivative of that would give you h'(x)=2f'(x) would it not? Similarly, if you were given h(x)=3f(3x^2) you would get h'(x)=3f'(3x^2)*(6x). So as long as you know f', you don't need to know f in order to determine g'.
#7
abbykeck
4
0
ok, so i think i know what your'e saying. so in my problem, would i end up with g'(x) = 2x*f'(-1/(x-1)^2)? then plug in 2 for all x's to get g'(2)??!
ok, so i think i know what your'e saying. so in my problem, would i end up with g'(x) = 2x*f'(-1/(x-1)^2)? then plug in 2 for all x's to get g'(2)??!
Yes, something like that. I mean: the approach is all right, but I don't really think you did the derivation well. You will need both the product rule and the chain rule!
#11
ashleyrc
23
0
wha am i using the chain rule for? the f(x/(x-1))? the product rule would be for x^2 and whatever that chain rule produces, correct? i'll try it out...