Two identical diffraction gratings

  • Thread starter Thread starter skrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


We shine a laser light on two identical diffraction gratings as shown in picture.
Captureg.PNG

Calculate ##x##, if in Fraunhofer diffraction image the seventh peak is missing.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


No idea actually. I know how to do this with one diffraction grating.

For one grating all one has to do is compute a product of Fourier transformations of aperture function and sum of delta functions.
For one grating, the result is ##u_p=C\frac{\sin(k_xa)}{k_xa}\frac{\sin(k_xNa)}{\sin(k_xa)}##.

But I have no idea what to do with two diffraction gratings? Is it simply a product of both where one is shifted for ##x## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would you take as:
- the separation of the gratings?
- the thickness of the gratings?
... try redrawing the diagram in a more realistic representation.

There is a clue in the description involving the Fraunhoffer diffraction image... why would there be a peak missing?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top