Two masses sliding in a track connected by springs

AI Thread Summary
To find the frequency of oscillation for two masses connected by a spring, the equation w^2 = k/m is relevant, where k is the spring constant and m is the effective mass. The center of mass (c.o.m) of the system remains stationary due to the absence of external forces. A suggested approach involves using the reduced mass principle and defining an appropriate coordinate system to derive the equations of motion. Additionally, the effective spring constant can be adjusted based on the configuration of the system. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
akinoshigure
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two masses m1=100g and m2=200g slide freely in a horizontal frictionless track and are connected by a spring whose force constant is k=.5N/m. FInd the frequency of oscillatory motion for this system.

I don't really know how to go about this problem. I'm assuming that the equation to find the frequency would be
w^2=k/m

I did try making the center of mass, but I wasn't sure if it was even necessary. I ended up with xcom=2/3*d where d is the distance from m1 to m2.

Any help or hints would be great. I just don't feel like banging my head on the desk anymore...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
O.K.
The c.o.m will remain stationary as there is no external force on the system.
Take force constant of that part of the spring only, which is (k d)/(2/3*d) = 3k/2
{?think}
Now with this k find frequency for 100 gm block.

One more way is there. Consider it as two body system and use reduced mass principle.
 
Start by defining a clever coordinate system and writing the equations of motion. Then you'll have to find a clever way to solve them. hint: Involves a change of variable.

As for "trying to make the center of mass", whatever that means, note that the net force on the system will always be 0, hence the CM will always remain in the same place. This is basically the most important point to realize in defining your clever coordinate system.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top