Two objects acceleration problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter MightyDogg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the scenario of a baby bird falling from a height and its mother needing to accelerate downward to catch it. The context is rooted in kinematics, specifically focusing on acceleration and the motion of falling objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the time taken for the baby bird to fall a certain distance and subsequently determine the required acceleration of the mother. Some participants question the interpretation of the negative acceleration and whether the problem requires only the magnitude.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes verification of calculations and clarification of the sign convention used for acceleration. Participants are exploring the implications of the negative sign in the context of direction and magnitude, with no explicit consensus reached on the final interpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the importance of establishing a coordinate system for future problems, indicating a potential area of confusion regarding directionality in kinematic equations.

MightyDogg
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A baby bird falls from a nest 18m high. After the bird falls 2 meters its mother realizes and catches it 1.5m off the ground. How fast must its mother accelerated down in order to catch its baby?

Homework Equations


x= \frac{1}{2} a t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the time it took the baby bird to fall 2m. It was .638 s. Then I calculated the total it takes for the baby bird to fall 16.5m (1.5m off the ground) and it was 1.835 s. Then I subtracted the two to get the time the mother has to reach its the baby bird. That time was 1.19s. Then I plug it back into the equation with 'x' as 16.5m. I calculate acceleration to equal -23m/s^2.

Is that correct? I think it is, I just want to double check. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks correct. I guess the negative sign indicates that the acceleration is downward. It could be that the problem is asking only for the magnitude of the acceleration in which case you could drop the sign. Hard to tell.
 
I forgot to mention when I put 16.5m into the last equation I made it negative because it was going downward, thus my acceleration turned out negative.

As long as the magnitude is correct then I'm ok with the problem. Thank you for double checking my work.
 
MightyDogg said:
I forgot to mention when I put 16.5m into the last equation I made it negative because it was going downward, thus my acceleration turned out negative.

As long as the magnitude is correct then I'm ok with the problem. Thank you for double checking my work.

As you get into more complicated questions, make sure to draw your coordinate system indicating which directions are positive! This can save you lots of heartache in the future, especially with problems relating to force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
969
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
862
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K