Stones Meet: Dropped & Thrown from Bridge

  • Thread starter Thread starter heythere1010
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics problem of two stones: one dropped from a bridge and another thrown upwards 2.5 seconds later. Both stones strike the water simultaneously, prompting questions about their meeting point and the setup of their equations. The first stone's motion is described by the equation d = 1/2(9.8)t², while the second stone's motion requires a different time variable due to its delayed launch. Participants suggest equating the distances traveled by both stones to solve for the time they meet, which is determined to be when they both hit the water. Clarifications are made regarding the initial conditions and the necessity of a consistent coordinate system for accurate calculations.
heythere1010
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A stone is dropped into the water form a bridge over top some water. Another stone is thrown vertically upward at 32.0m/s, 2.5 seconds after the first was dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. When do the stones meet from the dropping of the first stone?

Homework Equations


d=vi+1/2at^2
SUVAT equations

The Attempt at a Solution


d=1/2(9.8)(t)^2
=4.9t^2
This is for stone 1. I don't know how to setup the other equation since the distance traveled is not the same as stone 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
heythere1010 said:

Homework Statement


A stone is dropped into the water form a bridge over top some water. Another stone is thrown vertically upward at 32.0m/s, 2.5 seconds after the first was dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. When do the stones meet from the dropping of the first stone?
The second stone is thrown upwards and after the first, and they still end up meeting? Doesn't that seem a bit strange?

heythere1010 said:
I don't know how to setup the other equation since the distance traveled is not the same as stone 1.
The same way you did for stone one, but you use a different variable for time (say, capital T). There is a simple relationship between t (the time when the first stone starts it motion) and T (the time when the second stone starts it's motion). Do you know what it is?
 
OP, d in the equation$$ d = \frac{1}{2}at² $$
is not distance traveled by the particle,its the displacement, which in this case, is same for both the stones, so you can equate them, think of what Nathanael said, find the time for of flight for the 2nd stone,equate and solve for t.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure you have stated the problem correctly? If so then, as both Nathanael and Suraj N suggest, the "first time they meet" must be when they hit the water.

In any case, you can as you say, use the formula for motion under constant acceleration, (1/2)a(t- t0)^2+ u(t- t0)+ d where a is the constant acceleration, u is the initial speed, d is the initial height, and t0 is the time the motion starts. In order to use that, of course, you need to set up a "coordinate system". The standard thing to do is to take + upward, height= 0 at the surface of the water, and t0= 0 when the first stone is thrown. "A stone is dropped into the water form a bridge over top some water". So -9.8 m/s^2, u= 0, and we are not told how high the bridge is so leave that as "d0". d= -9.8t^2+ d0.

" Another stone is thrown vertically upward at 32.0m/s, 2.5 seconds after the first was dropped." Now, a= -9.8, u= 32, t0= 2.5, and d is still d0. d= -9.8(t- 2.5)^2+ 32t+ d0

"Both stones strike the water at the same time." So at some time t, both of those are equal to "d= d0" so are equal to each other: -98t^2+ d0= -9.8(t- 2.5)^2+ 32t+ d0.
That reduces to a linear equation for t. The two stones will have the same height for only one value of t, the time they hit the water together.[/I]
 
Nathanael said:
The second stone is thrown upwards and after the first, and they still end up meeting? Doesn't that seem a bit strange?
Would it make a difference if the second stone is thrown from the bottom? Like if one is dropped from the top, and the other is thrown upwards from the bottom.

HallsofIvy said:
Are you sure you have stated the problem correctly? If so then, as both Nathanael and Suraj N suggest, the "first time they meet" must be when they hit the water.[/I]
Yes, I see what you're saying. I don't think it makes sense in the question, but that is what it says. I think the question is trying to say the second stone is thrown from a different position (bottom of the bridge).
 
There are 2 equations ... so there can only be 2 free variables to solve for.
You're told the initial velocity for both stones (v1=0), but neither starting location, and neither ending location.
Because ending locations are the same, there can only be 1 "free" starting location
this means that the distance below the bridge that the 2nd stone must begin
is not free to vary ... it can be calculated (as part "b" for this scenario) after "t" is obtained.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top