Two questions involving factoring

  • Thread starter Thread starter erik05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two factoring problems. For the first expression, 5x^(1/2) - 15x^(3/2), the factorization 5x^(1/2)(1 - 3x) is confirmed as correct. In the second expression, 3(x-6)^2 + 2(x-6)^4 + 3/(x-6), the user initially misapplies factoring, leading to an incorrect form. The correct approach involves dividing by (x-6) after factoring, and it is clarified that further simplification is not valid due to the additional constant term. The conversation emphasizes careful attention to detail in factoring processes.
erik05
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I have two questions involving factoring and I seem to be stuck.

1) 5x^\frac {1}{2} - 15x^\frac{3}{2}


I tried it and got: 5x^\frac {1}{2} (1-3x)
I'm not too sure if you could go any further than this or if there's another way to approach this. The answer seems too simple and knowing my teacher, there's probably a more complicated one. Any thoughts?

2) 3(x-6)^2 + 2(x-6)^4 + \frac {3}{x-6}

so far I got: 3(x-6)^3 + 2(x-6)^5 + 3 and taking out a common factor of (x-6)^3 I got: (x-6)^3 (3+2(x-6)^2) + 3
I don't think this can be the simplest form so any suggestions or ideas? Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
erik05 said:
Hello all. I have two questions involving factoring and I seem to be stuck.

1) 5x^\frac {1}{2} - 15x^\frac{3}{2}


I tried it and got: 5x^\frac {1}{2} (1-3x)
I'm not too sure if you could go any further than this.

2) 3(x-6)^2 + 2(x-6)^4 + \frac {3}{x-6}

so far I got: 3(x-6)^3 + 2(x-6)^5 + 3 and taking out a common factor of (x-6)^3 I got: (x-6)^3 (3+2(x-6)^2) + 3
I don't think this can be the simplest form so any suggestions or ideas? Thanks for the help.

#1) CORRECT

#2) You forgot to divide thru by (x - 6) after multiplying by (x - 6) in your first step, so your final answer should be:

\frac {(x-6)^3 (3+2(x-6)^2) + 3} {x - 6}


~~
 
I have a question. Would it be correct then to simplify it even further by dividing the top (x-6)^3 with the bottom (x-6) to get an answer of (x-6)^2 (3+2(x-6)^2)+3 or no?
 
erik05 said:
I have a question. Would it be correct then to simplify it even further by dividing the top (x-6)^3 with the bottom (x-6) to get an answer of (x-6)^2 (3+2(x-6)^2)+3 or no?
It would not be correct to do that because of the +3 on the end.
 
I should learn to look at the question more carefully. Thanks man.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top