Two-state perturbation problem (QM)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tim87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perturbation Qm
Tim87
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given is a hamiltionan H0:

E1 0
0 E2

with E1 and E2 being eigenvalues of two eigenstates phi1 and phi2

A distortion W, with W12 = W21* (complex conjugate):

0 W12
W21 0

Calculate the eigenvalues and eigenstates of H = H0 + W


Homework Equations



See for most info:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node50.html

it's a two-state perturbation problem


The Attempt at a Solution



I found out most things like how to calculate the eigenvalues. A lot of it is explained at the mentioned site (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node50.html) The thing I don't get is how they got from the eigenvalues to the eigenstates.

I have tried the following:

( E1 - E1' W12 )(a) (0)
( W21 E2 - E1' )(b) = (0)

with E1' being the first new eigenvalue: E1'=E1 + |W12|^2/(E1-E2)

But I do not get to the answer provided on the site.


I hope I have been clear about my question, so someone can explain it to me. Thanks in advance!

Tim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that since eigenvectors are only defined up to a scaling, your matrix only represents one equation. So define a=kb, and solve for k. (This is the canonical way to proceed. In practice people just stare at it and then write down the solution.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top