Typical light levels at Mars's surface

AI Thread Summary
Typical light levels at the Martian surface, especially near the equator, are difficult to determine due to atmospheric dust interference. The Mars 3 lander recorded 50 lux during a dust storm in 1971, but this does not reflect typical conditions. Significant dust storms can block up to 99 percent of sunlight, as observed with the Opportunity rover in July 2007. Overall, average surface light levels are close to those above the atmosphere, but can drop significantly during dust events. Reliable measurements for typical light intensity on a dust-free day are still needed for accurate solar power assessments.
PolarPenguin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

Does anyone here know what the typical light levels are at the Martian surface (in daylight hours!) and how they vary in magnitude through time? I'd prefer a measurement close to the equator, but I'd be happy with one from anywhere at the surface.

I can easily calculate the solar irradiance and hence determine the light levels outside the atmosphere, but due to dust loading in the atmosphere that would be an approximation which does not hold at the surface. I am aware that the Mars 3 lander measured light levels of 50 lux (see: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0019103573901206 ) at the surface in 1971, and that that was suspected to be during a dust storm. I am also aware that the dust storms of July 2007 "blocked 99 percent of direct sunlight to [Opportunity]" (http://marsrover.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20070720a.html ) but neither of these give me a measure of the typical light intensity/level there on a day-to-day basis in a location with no dust storm activity at that time.

Any ideas or measurements/references? Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't find the map any more (might have been lost over the years) but the atmosphere doesn't absorb much on average - average surface levels are very close to the levels above the atmosphere, and similar to many spots on Earth where clouds lower the average a lot. There are periods where surface levels drop by a factor 10 or so (and direct light drops even more) however, relying on solar power alone is not a good idea.
 
PolarPenguin said:
Any ideas or measurements/references?
1989 study for NASA[
Worth a read.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890018252.pdf
Might as well throw this one in from 1976
https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/22925/0000491.pdf?sequence=1
... the 1971 dust storm. Their calculations indicate that the solar radiation absorbed
by wind-blown dust was enough to increase the lower atmosphere temperature
by 25°K day-L The Mariner 9 infrared spectrometer experiment (Hand et al.,
1972) and the radio occultation experiment (Kliore et al., 1972) show that the temperature
of the atmosphere was raised about 50°K during the storm, and that the
temperature profiles became almost isothermal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top