Unbounded Feasible Region for Lagrange with Two Constraints

Kaura
Messages
122
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



kuGWwwg.jpg


Homework Equations



Partials for main equation equal the respective partials of the constraints with their multipliers

The Attempt at a Solution



UmkCpuX.jpg


Basically I am checking to see if this is correct
I am pretty sure that 25/3 is the minimum but I am not sure how to find the maximum
The max an min at the bottom can be ignored or replaced with minimum
I have a lot to do today to prepare for midterms so any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaura said:

Homework Statement



kuGWwwg.jpg


Homework Equations



Partials for main equation equal the respective partials of the constraints with their multipliers

The Attempt at a Solution



UmkCpuX.jpg


Basically I am checking to see if this is correct
I am pretty sure that 25/3 is the minimum but I am not sure how to find the maximum
The max an min at the bottom can be ignored or replaced with minimum
I have a lot to do today to prepare for midterms so any help would be much appreciated

Your final solution looks OK, but I did not check the rest because I generally do not look at solutions given as posted images.

You should think about why your solution method does not give you a maximum.
 
Last edited:
So is 25/3 the only extrema and a minimum?
 
Kaura said:
So is 25/3 the only extrema and a minimum?
You tell me. But more importantly, what is the reason?
 
Ray Vickson said:
You tell me. But more importantly, what is the reason?

Yes? because the function is not bound and is continuous?
 
Last edited:
Kaura said:
Yes? because the function is not bound and is continuous?

Right, and because the feasible region (the set of allowed ##(x,y,z)## values) is unbounded. We can find feasible points ##(x,y,z)## with ##x,z \to -\infty,\: y \to +\infty## (and opposite); and of course, ##f \to +\infty## for such points.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top