Uncertainty Help: Working Out Approx % Error in Specific Heat Capacity

  • Thread starter Thread starter spoony33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainties
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the approximate percentage error in specific heat capacity, the total uncertainty must be determined first. The formula for uncertainty propagation states that for products, the relative error is the sum of the relative errors of the individual measurements. The relevant equation for heat transfer, Q=mcΔT, involves mass, specific heat capacity, and temperature change, where each component contributes to the overall uncertainty. To reduce the percentage error in specific heat capacity, one suggested method is to improve measurement accuracy, such as using more precise instruments. Understanding and applying these uncertainty propagation principles is essential for accurate calculations in thermodynamics.
spoony33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have this question for homework and I'm well stuck!


The specific heat capacity of a liquid was found by heating a measures quantity of the liquid for a certain length of time. The following results were obtained.
Power of heater: ( 50.0 ± 0.5)W
Mass of liquid: (200 ± 10)g
Time of heating: (600 ± 1)s
Temperature rise: (50.0 ± 0.5)°C

I managed to get the percentage error in each reading but i just don't know how to work out the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity!

A) What will the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity?
B) Suggest one way in which to reduce the percentage error obtained for the specific heat capacity?


I managed to work out this but i don't know how to work out the approximate percentage error in the value of specific heat capacity?
The percentage of uncertainty of each is:
Power of heater:
(±0.5)/50.0 = ± 1%

Mass of liquid
(±10)/200 = ± 5%

Time of heating:
(±1)/600 = ±0.167 %

Temperature Rise:
(±.5)/50.0 = ± 1%

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nah, you have to get the total uncertainty first.

So Q=mcT

I don't remember how the uncertainties propagate for products, but it's something you can look up, or if you know partial derivatives you can use the "master formula."
 
For products, the relative error on the measured quantity is equal to the sum of the relative errors. So if

z=x\cdot y

then

\frac{\Delta z}{z}=\frac{\Delta x}{x}+\frac{\Delta y}{y}

A more general approach is the formula for uncertainty on a measured quatity f(x,y). The absolute error in f is given by

\Delta f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y

and the standard deviation is given by

\sigma _f=\sqrt{(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \Delta x)^2+(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \Delta y)^2}

If you plug f(x,y)=x \cdot y into the formula for absolute uncertainty and rearrange a little, you'll notice that it reduces to the first formule for absolute error for products.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top