Uncertainty values for non-Gaussian functions

PhyPsy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Uncertainty values for non-Gaussian wave packet functions

Homework Statement


\phi(k)= \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2a^3}}(a-|k|), & |k| \leq a \\ 0, & |k|>a \end{array} \right.
\psi(x)= \frac{4}{x^2}sin^2 (\frac{ax}{2})
Calculate the uncertainties \Delta x and \Delta p and check whether they satisfy the uncertainty principle.

Homework Equations


\Delta x\Delta p \geq h/2

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is worked out in the book, which is \Delta k=a and \Delta x=\pi /a. I understand that for a Gaussian distribution, you can use the standard deviation as \Delta x and \Delta k, and this leads to the lowest limit of the uncertainty relation, h/2. I don't see how I'm supposed to come up with \Delta x and \Delta k for non-Gaussian functions, though. The book seems to just pick \Delta k=a and \Delta x=\pi /a somewhat arbitrarily without explaining why these values were chosen. Could someone tell me if there is a method for figuring out what the uncertainties should be for non-Gaussian functions like this one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If we are measuring the eigenvalue a of an observable A, then we may characterize the uncertainty \Delta a in a using the statistical variance:

(\Delta a)^2 = \langle A^2 \rangle - \langle A\rangle^2.

This definition works for any state we use to compute the expectation values. In fact, this definition is the one used in the derivation of the generalized uncertainty principle.
 
\langle A\rangle=0 for both functions, so (\Delta a)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty}a^2 f(a) da

(\Delta k)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} k^2 |\phi(k)|^2 dk = \frac{3}{2a^3} [\int ^0 _{-a} k^2 (a+k)^2 dk + \int ^a _0 k^2 (a-k)^2 dk]
=\frac{3}{2a^3} [(\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 + \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^0 _{-a} + (\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 - \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^a _0
=\frac{3}{2a^3} \frac{2}{30} a^5 = \frac{a^2}{10}
\Delta k = \frac{a}{\sqrt{10}}
\Delta p = \frac{a \hbar}{\sqrt{10}}

(\Delta x)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} x^2 |\psi(x)|^2 dx = 16 \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) dx / x^2
=16[\frac{1}{2} a Si(ax) - \frac{1}{4} a Si(2ax) - \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x]|^\infty _{-\infty} = 16(\frac{a \pi}{2} - \frac{a \pi}{4}) = 4a \pi
\Delta x = 2 \sqrt{a \pi}

\Delta p \Delta x = \frac{2a \hbar \sqrt{a \pi}}{\sqrt{10}}
So whether or not this is greater than \hbar / 2 depends on what a is. Did I do something wrong here?
 
Last edited:
PhyPsy said:
\langle A\rangle=0 for both functions, so (\Delta a)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty}a^2 f(a) da

(\Delta k)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} k^2 |\phi(k)|^2 dk = \frac{3}{2a^3} [\int ^0 _{-a} k^2 (a+k)^2 dk + \int ^a _0 k^2 (a-k)^2 dk]
=\frac{3}{2a^3} [(\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 + \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^0 _{-a} + (\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 - \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^a _0
=\frac{3}{2a^3} \frac{2}{30} a^5 = \frac{a^2}{10}
\Delta k = \frac{a}{\sqrt{10}}
\Delta p = \frac{a \hbar}{\sqrt{10}}

I agree with this, but we'd also want to calculate \Delta p using \hat{x} = -i\hbar d/dp in the momentum representation. Note that \psi(x) is not the Fourier transform of \phi(k), so we really have two problems to solve here.

(\Delta x)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} x^2 |\psi(x)|^2 dx = 16 \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) dx / x^2
=16[\frac{1}{2} a Si(ax) - \frac{1}{4} a Si(2ax) - \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x]|^\infty _{-\infty} = 16(\frac{a \pi}{2} - \frac{a \pi}{4}) = 4a \pi
\Delta x = 2 \sqrt{a \pi}

\Delta p \Delta x = \frac{2a \hbar \sqrt{a \pi}}{\sqrt{10}}
So whether or not this is greater than \hbar / 2 depends on what a is. Did I do something wrong here?

Again, this is a completely different wavefunction, so we can't use the uncertainty in momentum that we computed from the other one. Use \hat{p} = -i\hbar d/dx to compute it.
 
Actually, \psi (x) is the Fourier transform of \phi (k), or at least it is supposed to be...

\psi (x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \phi(k) e^{ikx} dk
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\int ^0 _{-a} (a+k)e^{ikx} dk + \int ^a _0 (a-k)e^{ikx} dk]
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\int ^0 _{-a} ke^{ikx} dk - \int ^a _0 ke^{ikx} dk + a \int ^a _{-a} e^{ikx} dk]
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\frac{a}{ix} e^{-iax} + (1 - e^{-iax} )/ x^2 - \frac{a}{ix} e^{iax} - (e^{iax} - 1)/ x^2 + 2a \sin (ax) /x]

At this point, the book just says that after some calculations, the answer is \psi (x) = 4 \sin ^2 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x^2. I don't know how they came up with that; the answer I got is \frac{\sqrt{3}}{x^2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [1 - \frac{ax}{2} \sin (ax) - \cos (ax)].
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top