Uncovering the Logic Behind the Center of Mass Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the center of mass formula, emphasizing its role as a weighted average of an object's mass distribution. The formula is derived from balancing torques around a pivot point, illustrating how the center of mass behaves like a single particle in motion. The relationship between the center of mass and Newton's second law is highlighted, showing that the total force acting on a system equals the mass of the system times the acceleration of the center of mass. This understanding clarifies the logic behind the formula, moving beyond rote memorization to a conceptual grasp of its significance. Overall, the center of mass serves as a crucial concept in analyzing the motion of complex systems.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


is there any intuition of why the center of mass formula is what it is? in high school the teacher says is is what it is and that's that or something like that but is there any logic behind it?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can think of the center of mass as the (weighted) average location of the mass of an object.
 
madah12 said:

Homework Statement


is there any intuition of why the center of mass formula is what it is? in high school the teacher says is is what it is and that's that or something like that but is there any logic behind it?
What center of mass formula are you talking about?

If you mean
\overline{x}= \frac{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)xdxdydz}{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)dxdydz}

\overline{y}= \frac{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)ydxdydz}{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)dxdydz}

\overline{z}= \frac{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)zdxdydz}{\int\int\int \rho(x,y,z)dxdydz}
where \rho is the density function and M is the total mass, then, as Doc Al said, it is basically an averaging.

Imagine having n masses, m1, m2, ..., mn at distances x1, x2, ..., xn from one end of a platform. Let \overline{x} be the distance from that end to a pivot below the platform at which the platform will balance. The torque due to the weight of each mass, around that end, is the weight times the distance: migxi. The total total torque on the board due to the weights is (m1x1+ m2x2+ ...+ mnxn)g. Of course, the pivot must be exerting an upward force equal to the total weight (m1+ m2+ ...+ mn)g and the torque due to that is (m_1+ m_2+ ...+ m_n)g\overline{x} and, in order to balance, those must be equal:

(m_1x_1+ m_2x_2+ ...+ m_nx_n)g= (m_1+ m_2+...+ m_n)g\overline{x}
the "g" on each side cancels so that
\overline{x}= \frac{m_1x_1+ m_2x_2+...+ m_nx_n}{m_1+ m_2+ ...+ m_n}

Taking the limit as the number of masses increases and the size of each goes to 0 converts those Riemann sums into integrals:
\overline{x}= \frac{\int \rho(x)x dx}{\int \rho(x) dx}

To convert from one to two or three dimensions, use double or triple integrals in the obvious way.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is it that we know that the center of mass WILL represent the system's motion as it is one particle?
 
madah12 said:
Why is it that we know that the center of mass WILL represent the system's motion as it is one particle?
That follows from the definition of center of mass and Newton's 2nd law:

R_{cm} \equiv \frac {\Sigma{m_i r_i}}{M}

Taking the derivative of both sides:

M a_{cm} = \Sigma{m_i a_i} = F_{total}
 
Doc Al said:
That follows from the definition of center of mass and Newton's 2nd law:

R_{cm} \equiv \frac {\Sigma{m_i r_i}}{M}

Taking the derivative of both sides:

M a_{cm} = \Sigma{m_i a_i} = F_{total}

ah I see it all makes sense now thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top