Uncovering the Mystery: Higgs Decay Modes and the Weight Paradox

zincshow
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Under the Higgs in wiki it says "Another possibility is for the Higgs to split into a pair of massive gauge bosons. The most likely possibility is for the Higgs to decay into a pair of W bosons (the light blue line in the plot), which happens about 23.1% of the time for a Higgs boson with a mass of 126 GeV/c^2."

But.. the mass of 2 W-bosons is 160 GeV/c^2...

How can a Higgs decay to 2 W bosons when they weigh more then the Higgs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a virtual Higgs particles. Virtual particles don't follow the dispersion relation E2 = (cp)2 + (mc2)2. With that equation out of the way it is possible for a Higgs to have enough energy to decay into two bosons.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks, does that mean that the final decay products have to be less then 126 GeV, or can they go up to the mass of the 2 W Bosons, Ie, 160 GeV?
 
The final decay products will have total energy equal to whatever was available in the collision to start with.

Note that although the Higgs boson is virtual and isn't required to be exactly 125 GeV, the probability of forming it increases the closer it is to 125 GeV. Remember that the W bosons are virtual also, and not required to be 160 GeV either.
 
The W bosons are much more likely to be virtual, compared to the Higgs. Just one of them has to be far away from its mass, so you usually see the decay products of a W boson with ~80 GeV and the decay products of a W boson with at most ~46 GeV, and if you combine both they come from a single particle with an energy very close to 126 GeV.

(all values refer to the invariant mass of the sum of the decay products)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top