Undergraduate Mechanics (Problem with force expressed as basis vectors)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses a homework problem involving force expressed as basis vectors, highlighting a discrepancy in the calculated magnitude of a vector and the values of sine and cosine for a specified angle. The user questions whether the textbook made an error, noting that a unit vector should have a magnitude of 1. Responses clarify that the basis vectors do not necessarily need to be unit vectors, despite one being specified as such, and that the angle is not exactly 60°. The use of a caret (^) on the e2 basis vector is discussed, with confirmation that while it may not be conventional, it is not mathematically incorrect. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding vector notation and the flexibility in defining basis vectors.
s3a
Messages
814
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


The problem along with its solution is attached as Problem 1-2.jpg.

Homework Equations


Norm of a vector.

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting from the final answer of the solution, sqrt((-0.625)^2 + (0.333)^2) == 0.708176532 != 1. Did the book do something wrong? I ask because, a unit vector should have a magnitude of 1. Also, sin(ϕ) = sin(60°) should equal 0.866025404 rather than 0.883 and cos(ϕ) = cos(60°) should equal 0.5 instead of 0.470. Am I missing something here?

Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Problem 1-2.jpg
    Problem 1-2.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 420
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like they're not requiring the basis vectors to be unit vectors (although they've specified e1 to be of unit length). Also, the angle ##\phi## is actually not precisely 60°, which you can work out from the calculated side lengths of the small triangle.
 
Thanks for pointing those out; I've now confirmed the numbers are correct in the solutions. Just to make sure I understood you correctly, it is wrong that they put a caret (^) on top of the e_2 basis vector, right? Other than that everything is correct, right?
 
s3a said:
Thanks for pointing those out; I've now confirmed the numbers are correct in the solutions. Just to make sure I understood you correctly, it is wrong that they put a caret (^) on top of the e_2 basis vector, right? Other than that everything is correct, right?
In general the caret on a variable can simply be taken to mean that it is a vector. Some publications use it to imply that the vector is a unit vector of a basis set in order to distinguish them from other vector variables. It is not a mandatory restriction, and in fact there's no mathematical necessity for basis vectors to be measured in units that make them have length "1", even if it is a practical convenience. So while it may not be conventional or esthetically pleasing to have the caret on the e2 basis vector when it's not of unit length, it's not technically incorrect.
 
Thanks again :).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top