Understanding Bound Charges and Their Mathematical Derivation

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Upon reading about bound charges I stumbled on something I didn't quite understand. It is not a physical thing but purely a mathematical thing.

In the attached section my book wants to take the gradient:

∇'(1/r)

with respect to the source coordinates, r'. Now, can someone by inspection of the attached file tell me what these source coordinates represent. Are they they coordinates of a point inside some charge distribution with respect to a fixed point inside the distribution? Would that then mean that in vector notation:

r = R + r'

where R is the distance from P to the reference point inside the distribution?

And from all that can someone tell me how you would differentiate ∇'(1/r) with respect to
r' to get the answer in the bottom of the attached file? :)

thanks
 

Attachments

  • boundcharges.png
    boundcharges.png
    22.2 KB · Views: 526
Physics news on Phys.org
hi aaaa202! :smile:
aaaa202 said:
… can someone by inspection of the attached file tell me what these source coordinates represent. Are they they coordinates of a point inside some charge distribution with respect to a fixed point inside the distribution?

no, (the diagram should say so, but doesn't :redface: …) they're the coordinates of the point marked "P" (which isn't the name of the point, it's the dipole moment density vector :rolleyes:) wrt a fixed origin (whose position doesn't matter)
… how you would differentiate ∇'(1/r) with respect to r' to get the answer in the bottom of the attached file? :)

should be easy now :wink:
 
I'm still a little confused on how r depends on r'. If R is the distance to the origin used for the coordinates r' isn't then, as I said:

r = R + r'

? :)
 
let's see …

in that integral, r is the outside point, and is fixed (a constant)

r is explained as the distance from r to r',

so r2 (the denominator) = (r - r')2

(the notation they're using is very misleading :redface:)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top