MHB Understanding Browder's Remarks on Linear Transformations

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am reading Chapter 8: Differentiable Maps ... ... and am currently focused on Section 8.1 Linear Algebra ... ...

I need some help in order to fully understand some remarks by Browder in Section 8.1, page 179 regarding the set of all linear transformations, $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ ... ...


The relevant statements by Browder follow Definition 6.10 and read as follows:
View attachment 9363In the above text from Browder, we read the following:

" ... ... The assignment of a matrix to each linear transformation enables us to regard each element of $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ as a point of Euclidean space $$\mathbb{R^{nm} }$$, and thus we can speak of open sets in $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$, of continuous functions of linear transformations, etc. ... ... "
My question is as follows:Can someone please explain, in some detail, how/why exactly the assignment of a matrix to each linear transformation enables us to regard each element of $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ as a point of Euclidean space $$\mathbb{R^{nm} }$$ ... ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Browder - Remarks on L(R^n, R^m) ... Section 8.1, Page 179 ... .png
    Browder - Remarks on L(R^n, R^m) ... Section 8.1, Page 179 ... .png
    31.8 KB · Views: 138
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Can someone please explain, in some detail, how/why exactly the assignment of a matrix to each linear transformation enables us to regard each element of $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ as a point of Euclidean space $$\mathbb{R^{nm} }$$ ... ...
A linear transformation in $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ is specified by an $m\times n$ matrix, which consists of $nm$ elements. If you string out those elements into a single row, they form the coordinates of a point in $$\mathbb{R^{nm} }$$.
 
Opalg said:
A linear transformation in $$\mathscr{L} ( \mathbb{R^n, R^m} )$$ is specified by an $m\times n$ matrix, which consists of $nm$ elements. If you string out those elements into a single row, they form the coordinates of a point in $$\mathbb{R^{nm} }$$.

Thanks for the help, Opalg ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K