Understanding Charge Density in Spherical Distributions: ρ=dQ(r)/dV(r)

AI Thread Summary
In spherical charge distributions, charge density ρ is defined as ρ=dQ(r)/dV(r) to ensure that integrating density over a volume yields the total charge. This approach contrasts with ρ=Q(r)/V(r), which does not account for variations in charge distribution. The integral of ρ(r) over a volume correctly restores the total charge, while the alternative expression does not. It is emphasized that densities and concentrations are typically derivatives, making infinitesimal considerations essential for accurate calculations. Understanding this principle is crucial for correctly applying charge density in physics.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Let's say you have a sphere which has a charge distribution where the charge behind a radius r can be expressed as Q(r). You also have the volume formula for a sphere, V(r).

Why is ρ, the charge density, defined as: ρ=dQ(r)/dV(r) instead of simply ρ=Q(r)/V(r)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By integrating the density over some volume, you should get the total charge in that volume. Which of the two expressions satisfies that?
 
Why can't you just integrate ρ(r) over a volume, with ρ(r) = Q(r)/V(r)?
 
Is ## \int \rho(r) dV = \int \frac {Q(r)} {V(r) } dV ## equal to Q? What about ## \int \rho(r) dV = \int \frac {dQ(r)} {dV(r) } dV ##?
 
I see it now. In the future, am i always supposed to use infinetesimal amounts for stuff like this?
 
It is hard to tell what you mean by "stuff like this", buy generally densities and concentrations are derivatives of some quantity with regard to volume (or mass), so that their integrals over some volume (or mass) restore the original quantity. If in doubt, just use this check.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top