Understanding Cosine Theta in Work Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Work Equation, specifically the role of the cosine theta component. The equation states that work equals force multiplied by distance and the cosine of the angle between the force and direction of motion. In the case presented, even though the force is applied offset, it still acts in the direction of motion, making the cosine term equal to one. Therefore, the primary concern is whether friction from the device's arms against the side walls affects the work calculation. Understanding this relationship clarifies how to compute work in scenarios involving offset forces.
Roger900
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Specialists,

I am having some difficulty understanding the Work Equation with respect to the Cosine Theta portion of the equation.

Work = Force * Distance * Cosine(theta)

Attached is a picture of two hypothetical mechanical devices. I understand how to calculate work for the device on the left side of the page. However, the device on the right side of the page is more confusing. With this device, the force is directed towards the same direction of travel of the linear bearing slides, but the force is being applied on an offset to direct linear travel. And here is the problem...because of the offset pushing motion, the "arms" of the device will want to push clockwise against the side walls of the linear bearing assembly. Is Cosine(theta) involved here, or just friction from pushing on the side walls? What would be the math formula to calculate work?

Thanks,
Roger
 

Attachments

  • Cosine Theta.jpg
    Cosine Theta.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 4,098
Physics news on Phys.org
Only the component of Force in the direction of motion will do work, hence the cosine term. In the second diagram, the cosine term still applies, but since the force is being applied in the same direction as the motion, the cosine term is just cos(0) which is 1.

Claude.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you Claude for taking the time to answer my question. I appreciate your knowledge. Roger
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top