Understanding Cubic Equations of State (Pressure-Volume Relationship)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the pressure-volume relationship in cubic equations of state, particularly through the lens of chemical thermodynamics. The original equation presented for pressure as a function of volume and temperature was initially differentiated incorrectly, leading to confusion regarding the existence of extrema in isotherm lines. Upon correcting the differentiation, it was clarified that the two terms in the equation can indeed have opposite signs, allowing for the possibility of local maxima and minima on the isotherm curves. The importance of accurately applying calculus to thermodynamic equations is emphasized for proper fluid property evaluation. This correction aids in grasping the behavior of isotherm lines at temperatures below the critical temperature.
ben_ob1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to teach myself some chemical thermodynamics, in particular some methods for fluid property evaluation. I am reading an excellent book which has helped a lot ("Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics", Smith-Van Ness-Abbott, Ed. 7, ISBN: 007-124708-4).

One thing that the book described, which I am now having some problems with, is the pressure-volume relationship of the cubic equations of state. Figure 3.11 in this book (page 92) shows a nice graph of this relationship with 3 isotherm lines. I have tried to make my own version of this figure (hopefully it is attached ok):

attachment.php?attachmentid=37873&stc=1&d=1312914978.jpg


The diagram shows that at temperatures less than the critical temperature (e.g. the T3 line) and for low pressures there are 3 vapour solutions (intersections with a horizontal pressure line).

Here is the equation:
P=\frac{RT}{V-b}-\frac{a}{\left(V+\epsilon b\right)\left(V+\sigma b\right)}

Where P is pressure, T is temperature and V is molar volume; a is a function of temperature (but is always positive) and b, \epsilon and \sigma are positive constants; R is the universal gas constant.

Differentiating this with respect to Volume while keeping T constant (an isotherm line) gives:
\left(\frac{dP}{dV}\right)_{T}=-\frac{RT}{\left(b-V\right)^{2}}-\frac{a\left(\epsilon b + \sigma b + 2V\right)}{\left(V+\epsilon b\right)^{2}\left(V+\sigma b\right)^{2}}

Did I do this right? If this differential is correct then I don't see how there can be any extrema (maxima or minima) for any isotherm lines. The 2 terms in the equation would have to cancel each other out in order for the differential to equal zero. As far as I can see both terms will always have the same sign (for positive values of V) meaning they can never cancel out. Is my logic wrong? How does the isotherm T3 get its local minimum and local maximum?

Hope you can help explain this for me.
Ben.
 

Attachments

  • CubicEoS_PV_Relationship.jpg
    CubicEoS_PV_Relationship.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 1,464
Engineering news on Phys.org
ben_ob1 said:
Differentiating this with respect to Volume while keeping T constant (an isotherm line) gives:
\left(\frac{dP}{dV}\right)_{T}=-\frac{RT}{\left(b-V\right)^{2}}-\frac{a\left(\epsilon b + \sigma b + 2V\right)}{\left(V+\epsilon b\right)^{2}\left(V+\sigma b\right)^{2}}

Oops found the mistake.

\left(\frac{dP}{dV}\right)_{T}=-\frac{RT}{\left(b-V\right)^{2}}+\frac{a\left(\epsilon b + \sigma b + 2V\right)}{\left(V+\epsilon b\right)^{2}\left(V+\sigma b\right)^{2}}
 
Back
Top