Understanding Differential Mode of BJT

  • Thread starter Thread starter kr0z3n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bjt Differential
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the differential mode of a BJT involves analyzing the base-emitter voltage (VBE) relationships. When +1V is applied to the base of Q1 and 0V to Q2, the emitter voltage is +0.3V because Q1's VBE must be +0.7V, while Q2's VBE falls to -0.3V. In the case of the emitter voltage being -0.7V, Q1 would have an impractical VBE of +1.7V, turning Q2 off as it would not receive sufficient emitter current. Typically, in differential operation, one transistor conducts more than the other, but both can be on within the linear range, reflecting their identical characteristics. The circuit behavior is dictated by the exponential relationship of the PN junction, where the transistor with the greater VBE will draw more current.
kr0z3n
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the differential mode for a BJT. For the second picture, when we apply +1V to the base of Q1 and 0V to the base of Q2. Why is the emitter voltage .3V instead of -.7V? Similarity, for the third picture, why is the emitter voltage -.7V instead of 1.7V?
Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-01-21 at 1.46.44 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-01-21 at 1.46.44 AM.png
    39.8 KB · Views: 381
Engineering news on Phys.org
kr0z3n said:
I'm trying to understand the differential mode for a BJT. For the second picture, when we apply +1V to the base of Q1 and 0V to the base of Q2. Why is the emitter voltage .3V instead of -.7V?
Because VBE of the ON transistor must be +0.7V.
Similarity, for the third picture, why is the emitter voltage -.7V instead of 1.7V?
For the same reason. If VBE is any value other than +0.7V it follows that an NPN transistor will not be functioning.
 
Because Q1 pulls the emitters to +0.3V while Q2 can't sink the voltage. It results from the non-linear behaviour of bipolar transistors, whose emitter current increases brutally if the base-emitter voltage exceeds the threshold.

By the way, 0.7V is not a universal value. A low-power bipolar has rather 0.6V or 0.65V, while many-amps bipolar can have 1.5V, most of it being wasted in the stray resistances to access the emitter and the base.
 
kr0z3n said:
I'm trying to understand the differential mode for a BJT. For the second picture, when we apply +1V to the base of Q1 and 0V to the base of Q2. Why is the emitter voltage .3V instead of -.7V?
Note the constant current source, I, in the emitter leads. So as one transistor conducts better and takes more emitter current, it deprives the other transistor of an equal amount of current. Whichever transistor has the greater VBE* has the greater IB therefore its emitter (and collector) will take the greater share of the fixed bias current, I.

* being a PN junction it obeys the V-I exponential curve

Back to your first question. If the emitter voltage is 0.3V, then Q1 has VBE=0.7V and Q2 has VBE=–0.3V, whereas if the emitter voltage were –0.7V, then Q1 would have VBE=+1.7V and Q2 would have VBE=0.7V

VBE=+1.7V is impractical here, but let's imagine Q1 was to be given a lot of base current, then it would take all of the available emitter current, I, in turn depriving Q2 of emitter current and turning Q2 off, meaning VBE of Q2 would fall below 0.7V.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Note the constant current source, I, in the emitter leads. So as one transistor conducts better and takes more emitter current, it deprives the other transistor of an equal amount of current. Whichever transistor has the greater VBE* has the greater IB therefore its emitter (and collector) will take the greater share of the fixed bias current, I.

* being a PN junction it obeys the V-I exponential curve

Back to your first question. If the emitter voltage is 0.3V, then Q1 has VBE=0.7V and Q2 has VBE=–0.3V, whereas if the emitter voltage were –0.7V, then Q1 would have VBE=+1.7V and Q2 would have VBE=0.7V

VBE=+1.7V is impractical here, but let's imagine Q1 was to be given a lot of base current, then it would take all of the available emitter current, I, in turn depriving Q2 of emitter current and turning Q2 off, meaning VBE of Q2 would fall below 0.7V.

So when analyzing the circuit, one of the transistors BE voltage has to be .7 and the other has to be less than .7? If Vbe is greater than .7 then it would be wrong? Also when doing these diff bjt, is it always one transistor on and one off? or can it have both transistors on?
 
Last edited:
kr0z3n said:
So when analyzing the circuit, one of the transistors BE voltage has to be .7 and the other has to be less than .7? If Vbe is greater than .7 then it would be wrong? Also when doing these diff bjt, is it always one transistor on and one off? or can it have both transistors on?
The extreme limit is when one is on and the other off. Normally they operate in the linear range, so one transistor conducts a little more than the other, according to the input level.

The transistors being on the same chip and therefore "identical", then the base-emitter voltage will be an indication of emitter current, in accord with the normal PN junction characteristic. So the transistor with the greater emitter current may have VBE=0.704V and the other may be 0.695V.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top