Understanding Direction of Wave Propagation with Poincaire Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how the Poincaré Sphere represents the polarization state of transverse electromagnetic (TEM) waves and the impact of wave propagation direction on this representation. The user illustrates their confusion with examples of circularly polarized waves traveling in both positive and negative z-directions, questioning whether both would be plotted at the north pole of the Poincaré Sphere despite having different handedness. They seek clarification on how the direction of wave propagation is factored into the polarization state when using the Poincaré Sphere. The core inquiry is whether the sphere needs to be inverted for waves traveling in opposite directions. The discussion highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the relationship between wave propagation direction and polarization representation on the Poincaré Sphere.
ask_LXXXVI
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
My doubt arises because I couldn't understand how a Poincaire Sphere gives us info about direction of propagation of wave. Now as we know Poincaire sphere is a neat way of showing the polarization state of an TEM wave. Now ,let me give an example to illustrate my doubt : -

Let us take a uniform plane TEM wave traveling in +z direction which is composed of two linearly polarised TEM waves , one whose electric field lies in X direction , the other whose electric field lies in Y direction . Let us take the case of circular polarisation
so we take ,

Ex = E0 cos(\omega t - \beta z) ax
Ey = E0 cos(\omega t - \beta z + \pi\2) ay

Now the resultant TEM wave has the Electric field vector left handed circularly polarised .
On the Poincaire Sphere this will be given by the north pole point.
Suppose we had same wave but traveling in -ve z direction.
Ex = E0 cos(\omega t + \beta z) ax
Ey = E0 cos(\omega t + \beta z + \pi\2) ay
So the wave should be right handed circularly polarised(I hope I am right here ) . Now as far as I know , while plotting the polarisation state on the Poincaire sphere we simply take the Phase difference between the two waves and the ratio of their magnitudes into consideration .So according to me , this wave will also be plotted on the north pole point.

Isn't this a discrepancy (maybe of my understanding) that a right handed circular polarised wave is getting plotted to north pole. So do we invert the Poincaire sphere if we reverse direction of propagation of wave?

My doubt basically boils down to this - while plotting Polarisation state of a TEM wave on a Poincaire sphere , how is the direction of propagation of the TEM wave taken into account ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


please help in solving my doubt! I hope I was clear in stating the doubt!
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top