Understanding kN in Torque Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Enoch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that kN stands for kilonewtons, which is a unit of force equal to 1,000 newtons. A participant is solving a torque problem involving a beam and weights, needing to express the tension in kN. They correctly identify that to convert from newtons to kilonewtons, one must divide the newton value by 1,000. The conversation confirms that an answer of 1054.47 N translates to 1.05447 kN. Understanding this conversion is essential for accurately solving torque problems in the context provided.
Enoch
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Unit kN? What is it?

I have a question asking for the tension in a cable that supports a beam. It asks me to find the answer in kN.

What is kN? I know how to solve the problem, but I have no idea what this unit is...What is k?

Figure at the bottom in an attachment.

For the record the question is a torque problem, with given mass values for a beam and two weights in kilograms, as well as the theta value (39 degrees) in tension. I'm assuming I multiply gravity times the mass to get the weight, so that this equation works.

Weight1 X (Length/2) + Weight2 X (Length) + Weight3 (aribitrary distance) = Length X Tsin(39)

This equation has proved correct in a quiz, and it has been explained to me by several profs. However, when I try to apply it to find the answer in kN...I get the wrong answer. Am I converting the weight wrong or is it something else? I realllly need help on this guys :).
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
kN is KILO Newtons (x10^3) Newtons
in most cases something like m, d, D, preceeding N where N is Newtons for force, then its usually a smaller unit
 
stunner5000pt said:
kN is KILO Newtons (x10^3) Newtons
in most cases something like m, d, D, preceeding N where N is Newtons for force, then its usually a smaller unit

So if I had an answer like 1054.47 N, it would be 1.05447 kN?
 
Enoch said:
So if I had an answer like 1054.47 N, it would be 1.05447 kN?
yes that's right
 
Thanks a lot stunner!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top