Understanding Light and Lens Problems in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter jst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Light
AI Thread Summary
Light and lens problems often involve understanding key concepts like Snell's law and the mirror equation. The discussion highlights a lack of confidence in solving these problems, with a request for general problem-solving strategies rather than detailed solutions. Snell's law is emphasized for refraction questions, particularly in relation to total internal reflection. The mirror equation is also mentioned as a fundamental tool for analyzing lens problems. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying concepts and providing guidance for similar physics problems.
jst
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Damn light & lens problems :(

The problems come from a homework that I've already submitted. I got some right and some wrong, but the ones that I did correctly I'm not too confident in method (which including guessing at times). There's really not really a lot of calculations involved in solving these, but it seems to me I'm just not fully understanding a couple of key concepts. Since some of these problems are similar, I'm not asking for them to be worked out...maybe just some pointers? Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Jason

#1http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/01.jpg

#2http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/02.jpg

#3http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/03.jpg

#4http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/04.jpg

#5http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/05.jpg

#6http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/06.jpg

#7http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/07.jpg

#8http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/08.jpg

#9http://www.glomawr.com/phy-t3/09.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Great! This forum is full of lifesavers :D
 
Ok what are you having troubles with? Do you want a general problem solving strategy for mirrors and lenses or do you have specific questions?
 
I think a "general problem solving strategy" would do it...a lot of these problems seem similar. If you understand these problems, anything you think that would be helpful would be really cool.
 
Last edited:
Ok well for the first one, and any other refraction question you must use Snells law:

n_{i}*sin(\theta_{i})=n_{r}*sin(\theta_{r})

where n_{i} is the index of refraction for the medium from which the light ray is originating (in the case of the first question, 2.42). The angles are always measured with respect to the normal line (a line drawn perpendicular to the surface) The index of refraction for air is 1.00. Notice how the question is asking what is the minimum angle, which means that the light ray would refract with an angle of refraction equal to 90degrees (it would not exit the diamond). This is called total internal reflection.

So you would basically just plug in ni=2.42 nr=1.00 and \theta_{r}=90deg and solve for the angle of incidence...

This is a lot of stuff to explain lol. Its like a whole chapter out of a textbook. (I would enjoy helping you) Just start asking specific questions and I will try my best to answer them.

Do you know how to use the mirror equation?

\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{d_{i}} + \frac{1}{d_{o}}

Does this make any sense?
 
Last edited:
I think I've used that equation...is that for #3?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...

Similar threads

Back
Top