Understanding Lorentz Invariants and Momentum for My Exam Tomorrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Momentum
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Let P be the 4 momentum
u be the 4 velocity
a) Evaluate the Lorentz invariant P^2
b)Differentiate P^2=P_{\mu}P_{\mu} and show that
\vec{u}\cdot\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}\right)=m_{0}c^2\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}\right)

2. The attempt at a solution

The first part yields an answer of E^2 -p^2 c^2=m^2 c^4

Now for part b. Does the P^2 have anything to do with the equality that needs to be proven? Do i need to differentiate P^2 with respect to time? Do i hav to differentiate
E^2 -p^2 c^2=m^2 c^4 with respect to time?

Please help!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:

Homework Statement


Let P be the 4 momentum
u be the 4 velocity
a) Evaluate the Lorentz invariant P^2
b)Differentiate P^2=P_{\mu}P_{\mu} and show that
\vec{u}\cdot\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{m_{0}\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}\right)=m_{0}c^2\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-u^2/c^2}}\right)

2. The attempt at a solution

The first part yields an answer of E^2 -p^2 c^2=m^2 c^4

Now for part b. Does the P^2 have anything to do with the equality that needs to be proven? Do i need to differentiate P^2 with respect to time? Do i hav to differentiate
E^2 -p^2 c^2=m^2 c^4 with respect to time?

Please help!

Thanks

Yes, differentiate with respect to time. The derivative of P^2 obviously gives zero since m^2 c^4 is constant.

Now, write P^2 = E^2 - p dot p c^2

(my small p is the three momentum and dot is the dot product

so d/dt(P^2) = 2 E dE/dt - 2 c^2 p dot dp/dt

This must be zero. Now write E= gamma mc^2 and p = gamma m u where u is the ordinary three velocity
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top