Why Are Moments Calculated Differently for Force Components in Statics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eurekameh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the calculation of moments for a 50 N force applied to a pulley at a 45-degree angle. The confusion arises from why the moment calculated as -50(0.15) does not equal the sum of the moments from its components, which is (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15). It is clarified that the force is not applied at the top of the pulley, and the perpendicular distance used in the component calculations is not 0.15 m. To obtain consistent results, one should either calculate the correct perpendicular distance or apply the cross product rule. Understanding these principles ensures accurate moment calculations in statics.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eurekameh said:
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?

I have a 22" monitor, but that image is still too small to read anything?
 
eurekameh said:
Here is my question:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/unledasm.png/
On this figure, there is a 50 N force on the bigger pulley. When summing up the moments about the x-axis, why isn't -50(0.15) [circled on figure] the same as (-50cos45)(0.15) + (-50sin45)(0.15), which is the sum of the moments of its components?
I was able to see the image. The 50 N force is applied to the pulley tangent to its circumference at a point 45 degrees counterclockwise from its vertical z axis. It is not applied at the top of the pulley. When you break it into its components, the perpendicular distance is not 0.15 m. Either calculate the perpendicular distance, or use the cross product rule, when calculating the sum of moments this way, and you get the same result.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I was able to see the image. The 50 N force is applied to the pulley tangent to its circumference at a point 45 degrees counterclockwise from its vertical z axis. It is not applied at the top of the pulley. When you break it into its components, the perpendicular distance is not 0.15 m. Either calculate the perpendicular distance, or use the cross product rule, when calculating the sum of moments this way, and you get the same result.

This helped me. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top