Understanding Normal Force Direction in Leaning Ladder & Cable Beam Systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the direction of normal forces in leaning ladder and cable beam systems. Participants explore the definitions and implications of normal forces in different contexts, particularly focusing on how these forces interact with surfaces and other forces in static equilibrium scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a normal force is defined as being perpendicular to the surface it acts upon, questioning why this is not the case for the cable beam problem.
  • One participant suggests that if the beam is not supported by the wall, it would fall, implying that the wall must exert a force on the beam in a direction that is not purely vertical.
  • Another participant proposes that the forces acting on the hinge include a frictional force acting upwards and a normal force acting to the right, seeking clarification on this arrangement.
  • There is a suggestion that if the beam is attached to the wall, the nature of the normal force may change, raising questions about its existence and direction.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the phrase "not tilted in the same direction as the wall," asking for conditions under which the normal force could have various orientations.
  • Another participant indicates that the direction of the normal force cannot be definitively known without performing an equilibrium analysis, emphasizing the importance of other forces present in determining the normal force's components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the direction of the normal force in the cable beam scenario, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining about how to determine the normal force's orientation based on different conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the normal force direction due to dependencies on specific configurations and the need for equilibrium analysis, which remains unresolved in the conversation.

terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13
I know that normal force is a reaction force.

http://www.sumoware.com/images/temp/xzhhpaacgkdktjna.png
In the leaning ladder problem, the normal force is perpendicular to the floor and the wall.
But, in the cable and beam problem, why isn't the normal force perpendicular to the wall ?

http://www.sumoware.com/images/temp/xzeanhxxmcalmnkn.png Hmm.. Then, I imagine what the system (cable and beam) will be without the wall.
I think that the beam will fall down.
And, because the beam touches the wall, the wall will exert a force back to the beam at right direction.
So, the normal force will have up and right direction.

But, I imagine the ladder problem.
But, Why the N1 doesn't have the upward direction ?
I think if there is no wall, then the ladder must fall and rotate counter-clockwise.

Please explain me how to determine the normal force direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A normal force is by definition normal to the surface. If there is nothing else holding the beam at its contact point, it will fall down. The "something else" can be a frictional force due to a rough surface (in which case the resultant force will not be normal to the wall) or that the beam has been attached to the wall.
 
Orodruin said:
A normal force is by definition normal to the surface. If there is nothing else holding the beam at its contact point, it will fall down. The "something else" can be a frictional force due to a rough surface (in which case the resultant force will not be normal to the wall) or that the beam has been attached to the wall.

Hmm..
So, the force in up direction on the hinge is the frictional force
And the force in right direction on the hinge is the normal force
The resultant is the frictonal force + the normal force
Do I get this right?

And, if the beam is attached to the wall, is there any normal force ?
 
terryds said:
So, the force in up direction on the hinge is the frictional force

If you have a hinge, it is a completely different situation. There is a normal force from the hinge, but the hinge contact point is not tilted in the same direction as the wall. It is therefore misleading to talk about it as a normal force to the wall.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds
Orodruin said:
If you have a hinge, it is a completely different situation. There is a normal force from the hinge, but the hinge contact point is not tilted in the same direction as the wall. It is therefore misleading to talk about it as a normal force to the wall.

image100820141719.jpg

From the picture above, I have no idea about 'not tilted in the same direction as the wall'.
Then, how to know that the normal force is up and right in direction ?
What will the condition be if the normal force is down and right, or down and left, or etc ?
 
You do not, you can guess it (based on the other forces present) and define your force components in such a way, but you will not know for sure until you do the equilibrium analysis and find out what the components of the force are. The condition is that the beam is in equilibrium and the rest should follow from there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K