Understanding Orthogonality in Wavefunctions

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellomister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orthogonality
hellomister
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you want to show two wavefunctions are orthogonal, do you have to normalize the wavefunctions first then take the integral of the product and see if they're equal to 0?

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


not really applicable. I just want a explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope. Orthogonality just requires the inner product to be zero.

A good visualization (though not in Hilbert space): In Euclidean 3-space (where inner product is the dot product) orthogonal vectors are perpendicular. Normalization scales vectors to the unit length. Heres the point: two vectors are perpendicular (orthogonal) regardless of their magnitude.

Normalized, orthogonal vectors have a name too: orthonormal.
 
okay thank you for the help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top