Understanding Pressure Equations in Linear and Abstract Algebra

  • Thread starter Thread starter Auto Engineer
  • Start date Start date
Auto Engineer
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, could someone please advise;

The equation;

PA - P atm A = K, change in X

If I wish to factor this equation to get "p" on its own, then;

PA - P atm A = K, change in X
= A ( P - P atm)

so the conclusion I draw is;

(P - P atm)A = K, change in X

My confusion is that I cannot work out how or where the second "A" went?

Could somebody put some light on the topic for me:confused:

David:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Auto Engineer said:
Hi everyone, could someone please advise;

The equation;

PA - P atm A = K, change in X

If I wish to factor this equation to get "p" on its own, then;

PA - P atm A = K, change in X
= A ( P - P atm)
If it is "P" you want to get on its own, why don' you take P out rather than A?

so the conclusion I draw is;

(P - P atm)A = K, change in X

My confusion is that I cannot work out how or where the second "A" went?

Could somebody put some light on the topic for me:confused:

David:smile:[/QUOTE]
PA- P atm A= K
P(A- atm A)= K

P= k/(A- atm A)= k/(A(1- atm)).

12 - 6= 3(4)- 3(2)= 3(4- 2). Where did the second "3" go? That is the distributive law: ax+ ay= a(x+ y).
 


HallsofIvy said:
If it is "P" you want to get on its own, why don' you take P out rather than A?

so the conclusion I draw is;

(P - P atm)A = K, change in X

My confusion is that I cannot work out how or where the second "A" went?

Could somebody put some light on the topic for me:confused:

David:smile:
PA- P atm A= K
P(A- atm A)= K

P= k/(A- atm A)= k/(A(1- atm)).

12 - 6= 3(4)- 3(2)= 3(4- 2). Where did the second "3" go? That is the distributive law: ax+ ay= a(x+ y).[/QUOTE]

The above distributive law is ok, but my example I feel you have misunderstood it:frown:

If "P" referred to "pressure" and "A" referred to "area", and "atm" was atmosphere, then one cannot remove "P" in that way and leave "atm" because "P" is the pressure of the atmosphere?
If using your method we said; PA - P atm A = K, and then you said; P(A - atm A) = K, the atmosphere cannot exist without "P" pressure, so A - A = 0, so P = K, the rest does not make sense to me, sorry:frown:

When the equation ends up with; (P - P atm)A = K, change in X, then I could work out from that the change in length of X?, this is because P - P atm means that say something (600 000 - 100 0000 = 500 000 x A = K, change in X, if you follow me with what I mean?

The equation is being factored to show the result obtained, I just need to understand how A seems to go missing?:frown:

David:smile:
 


Apparently I did misunderstand. Perhaps if you told me what all this (particularly "the atmosphere cannot exist without "P" pressure") has to do with "Linear and Abstract Algebra", it would help.
 


HallsofIvy said:
Apparently I did misunderstand. Perhaps if you told me what all this (particularly "the atmosphere cannot exist without "P" pressure") has to do with "Linear and Abstract Algebra", it would help.

Sorry that is my fault:eek:

P = pressure, but the equation is using more than one pressure which is why there are two "P"'s present, so (P - P atm) is saying that one pressure could be say liquid and then the other P atm is the atmospheric pressure. Also "A" is considered in this equation to be the area of a property, so a cylinder would be an example. K is understood to be a constant, and X is the change in length of a property like a spring, but the right hand side of the equation can be ignored when re aranging for "P". I am to understand the method is to factorise it, but I can only do so much of it.

So to recap;

PA - P atm A = K, change in X

= (P - P atm)A

This is all I know, what confuses me is where the second "A" went?

David:smile:
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top