Understanding Pulley Acceleration: Newton's Third Law and Mass Ratios"

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on pulley acceleration, it is clarified that even if mass m1 is greater than m2, m2 accelerates downwards due to the relationship between tension and weight. Newton's Third Law indicates that while m1 pulls the rope to the right, m2 experiences an upward tension and a downward weight. The net force on m2 is not zero because its weight exceeds the tension in the rope. Both masses are interconnected, meaning they share the same acceleration. The equations governing their motion reveal that m2's downward acceleration results from the balance of forces acting on both masses.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



hi in this picture ( http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/8458/53487724.png ) the teacher says that even if m1 is greater than m2 m2 will accelerate down and m1 will accelerate to the right but by Newtons third law shouldn't m1 have a leftward force to the rope which should pull m2 up?

Homework Equations



F(m2 to rope ) = -F(rope to m2)
F(m1 to rope ) = -F(rope to m1)

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Newton's 3rd law says that the rope pulls m1 to the right, and m1 pulls the rope to the left (and this in turn pulls m2 in an upwards direction*). There is no force on m1 to the left.
* This upwards force on m2 acts against the weight of m2 downwards.
So as far as m2 is concerned, there are 2 forces, its weight downwards, and the tension in the rope upwards.
As far as m1 is concerned, there is a force from the rope pulling to the right.
 


so why does m2 accelerate downwards? since tension is up and weight is down shouldn't Fnet = 0 ?
 


madah12 said:
so why does m2 accelerate downwards? since tension is up and weight is down shouldn't Fnet = 0 ?

It accelerates downwards because
a) its weight mg is greater than T, the tension in the string; and
b) the mass m1 is pulled by a force (T) to the right, and the two masses are connected to the same string.
Think about it; how could m1 accelerate to the right yet m2 not accelerate down?
Because they are connected, both masses must have the same acceleration, a.
The equation for m2 is M2g-T=M2a
The equation for m1 is T=M1a
Given g, m1 and m2 you have 2 unknowns, a and T, and two equations.
Eliminate T and solve for a will give you the common acceleration of both masses.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top