Understanding Reflection and Ion Movement in EM Waves

AI Thread Summary
Reflection in electromagnetic (EM) waves occurs when the incident wave penetrates a conductor, causing electrons to oscillate and radiate waves that can cancel the incident wave, resulting in reflected waves. In water, light is not stopped due to its high frequency, as there are insufficient free electrons to respond to the incident wave, leading to reflection from the water's volume instead. The thickness of the conductor affects the intensity of the radiated waves, which can have opposite amplitudes to the incident wave. Although waves radiate in all directions from oscillating electrons, the total wave does not necessarily radiate isotropically due to the summation of point sources. Overall, while reflection occurs at surfaces, the behavior of waves can be complex and influenced by the medium's properties.
Thierry12
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
1. Since skin depth is the attenuation of the wave in a conductor, this means the reflection isen't the incident wave... so what is the reflection?

2. Water doesn't stop light since it's frequency is too high, i saw on forum it's because the big ions can't move fast enought. How can that be? Wont they move as the same frequency as the wave?

Ty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thierry12 said:
1. Since skin depth is the attenuation of the wave in a conductor, this means the reflection isen't the incident wave... so what is the reflection?

2. Water doesn't stop light since it's frequency is too high, i saw on forum it's because the big ions can't move fast enought. How can that be? Wont they move as the same frequency as the wave?

Ty

The incident wave penetrates deeper than the skin layer. It makes the electrons oscillate and radiate in all directions. The waves radiated in the incident wave direction add with the incident wave. The thicker layer, the more intense the radiated wave. It happens it has the opposite sign amplitude. So the radiated and incident waves gradually cancel when you go inside.

The waves radiated with the electrons in the opposite direction are called the "reflected" waves.

In water there too few free electrons to radiate under the incident wave influence. Yet the same phenomenon takes place, so you have reflection from the water volume too.

Bob.
 
thanks alot!
 
Can someone tell me why waves arent comming out of every borders since it radiates in all directions?
 
The total wave does not radiate in every direction though. You can decompose any wave into being the result of a summation of point sources. These point sources radiate in all directions using a spherical wave. But the sum total of all these sources is not guaranteed to radiate isotropically.

Either way though, for the most part there is generally some reflection of waves off of all surfaces.
 
thanks a lot for the help again!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top