Understanding Relative Motion in a Constantly Moving Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter say_physics04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
In a plane moving at constant velocity, a person walking back and forth inside the plane is indeed in motion relative to the plane itself. The concept of relative motion indicates that movement is always measured with respect to a reference point, in this case, the plane. When standing still in the plane, a person is at rest relative to the plane, but walking means they are in motion relative to it. The analogy of needing to walk to the toilet illustrates that without movement, reaching a destination within the plane would be impossible. Understanding relative motion clarifies that motion is dependent on the chosen frame of reference.
say_physics04
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
sorry for this question but I'm just so irritated at my professor...

He asked me in front of class this:
I'm in a plane moving at constant velocity. I am walking back and forth inside the plane. Am I moving relative to the whole plane or not?

I answered I'm at rest. HE told me that I'm in motion relative to the whole plane. I just want to make sure... and to know why...

thx...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you're moving with respect to the plane-- why would you think you were stationary? Suppose you were on the plane, sat down at your seat, and wanted to go to the toilet. To do this you stand up and walk down the aisle. Now, if you weren't moving relative to the plane, then you wouldn't be able to get to the toilet would you?
 
thx... i was just confused
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top