Understanding Simple Harmonic Motion: Contradicting Acceleration and Velocity

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion, acceleration is always directed towards the equilibrium point, which is opposite to the elongation. Despite the negative sign of acceleration, the velocity increases as the pendulum approaches equilibrium. This indicates that both acceleration and velocity can have the same sign when moving towards equilibrium. Consequently, a negative velocity combined with a negative acceleration results in an increase in speed. Understanding this relationship clarifies the apparent contradiction in the motion dynamics.
Bim
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When observing the acceleration graph of simple harmonic motion we can see that the acceleration is just the opposite of the elongation. Yet we know that the pendulum velocity is increasing when approaching the equilibrium state. Which means that the motion is accelerated altough the sign of the acceleration is negative. How to understand this contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bim said:
When observing the acceleration graph of simple harmonic motion we can see that the acceleration is just the opposite of the elongation.
The restoring force, and the resulting acceleration, always points towards the equilibrium point.
Yet we know that the pendulum velocity is increasing when approaching the equilibrium state.
That's what acceleration does! :wink:
Which means that the motion is accelerated altough the sign of the acceleration is negative.
The acceleration is always toward the equilibrium point. Thus when the object moves towards equilibrium, its speed increases: both its acceleration and velocity will have the same sign. (Both negative on one side of equilibrium, both positive on the other.)

Realize that something with a negative velocity and a negative acceleration will speed up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top