Understanding the Equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter highc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2 was initially discussed, but it was identified as incorrect. The correct form should be (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/S^2, highlighting a significant error in the original equation. Additionally, there were concerns about unit consistency, as S is a length while the right side of the equation had units of length squared. Given these inaccuracies, the derived value for S is deemed irrelevant. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying equations and their units in physics problems.
highc
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a problem that was posted here a while ago (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=115170). maltesers posted the equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2, so far this makes perfect sense, he then goes on to solve for S with S = r - (mr^2)/M, and it is here that he loses me. How did we eliminate the ^2 to go from (r-S)^2 to S = r - ...?

I've been out of the math game a little too long!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}
 
neutrino said:
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}

This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
 
George Jones said:
This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
Now that it's known that the original equation is wrong, why bother about what was derived from it. :-p

Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Thanks alot, I wasted way too much time on this one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top