Understanding the Equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter highc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2 was initially discussed, but it was identified as incorrect. The correct form should be (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/S^2, highlighting a significant error in the original equation. Additionally, there were concerns about unit consistency, as S is a length while the right side of the equation had units of length squared. Given these inaccuracies, the derived value for S is deemed irrelevant. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying equations and their units in physics problems.
highc
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a problem that was posted here a while ago (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=115170). maltesers posted the equation (Gm)/(r-S)^2 = (GM)/r^2, so far this makes perfect sense, he then goes on to solve for S with S = r - (mr^2)/M, and it is here that he loses me. How did we eliminate the ^2 to go from (r-S)^2 to S = r - ...?

I've been out of the math game a little too long!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}
 
neutrino said:
That equation is actually incorrect. It should have been

\frac{Gm}{(r-S)^2} = \frac{GM}{S^2}

This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
 
George Jones said:
This not the only thing wrong.

Look at units. In maltesers' last equation, S is a length, while the last term on the right has units of length squared.
Now that it's known that the original equation is wrong, why bother about what was derived from it. :-p

Thanks for pointing that out.
 
Thanks alot, I wasted way too much time on this one.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top