Understanding the Limit of Sin(dx/2)/(dx/2) = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The limit of sin(x/2)/(x/2) as x approaches 0 equals 1 because for small values of x, sin(x) approximates x, making the ratio approach 1. This approximation is more accurate for x/2, which is even closer to zero. Calculating sin(x)/x for small x values in radian mode demonstrates this behavior effectively. It's crucial to use radians since the approximation does not hold for degrees, as sin(1 degree) is significantly different from 1. Thus, understanding this limit relies on the small-angle approximation in radians.
thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
In one of the examples in my book , it says that

\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin \frac{\delta x}{2}}{\frac{\delta x}{2}}=1

how can that be ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thereddevils said:
In one of the examples in my book , it says that

\lim_{\delta x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin \frac{\delta x}{2}}{\frac{\delta x}{2}}=1

how can that be ?

Let's make the limit a little simpler by getting rid of the Greek letters. They don't really add anything and it's a pain to have to type in \delta all the time.

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin \frac{x}{2}}{\frac{x}{2}}=1

This can be and is because for values of x that are close to zero, sin(x) is approximately equal to x, making the ratio close to 1. You can convince yourself of the reasonableness of my claim by using your calculator (in radian mode) to calculate sin(x)/x for x = .1, .01, .001, and so on (also for negative x that is close to 0).

In this problem, if x is close to zero, then x/2 will be even closer to zero, so the ratio sin(x/2)/(x/2) will be even closer to 1 than would be the ratio of sin(x)/x.

Note that I am not proving anything here.
 
Mark44 said:
Let's make the limit a little simpler by getting rid of the Greek letters. They don't really add anything and it's a pain to have to type in \delta all the time.

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin \frac{x}{2}}{\frac{x}{2}}=1

This can be and is because for values of x that are close to zero, sin(x) is approximately equal to x, making the ratio close to 1. You can convince yourself of the reasonableness of my claim by using your calculator (in radian mode) to calculate sin(x)/x for x = .1, .01, .001, and so on (also for negative x that is close to 0).

In this problem, if x is close to zero, then x/2 will be even closer to zero, so the ratio sin(x/2)/(x/2) will be even closer to 1 than would be the ratio of sin(x)/x.

Note that I am not proving anything here.


thanks Mark , but why must it be in radian mode ?
 
thereddevils said:
thanks Mark , but why must it be in radian mode ?

Because sin(x)~x for x small only works if x is radians. sin(1 degree) is nowhere near 1.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top