Understanding the Parametric Form of an Ellipse: Step-by-Step Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter winbacker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the equation of an ellipse, specifically (x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4, into its parametric form. Participants are exploring the relationship between the standard form of an ellipse and its parametric representation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks a step-by-step explanation of the translation to parametric form. Some participants discuss the general structure of parametric equations for ellipses, questioning how to identify the center and the constants involved. Others suggest methods for transforming the ellipse equation into a form resembling that of a circle, exploring substitutions and relationships between variables.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants actively questioning assumptions about the ellipse's center and the parameters involved. There is a mix of confusion and exploration of different approaches, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the transformation process and the definitions of the parameters involved.

winbacker
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have the solution to a problem and I need help understanding how the solution was obtained.

I have to take an equation of an ellipse and transfer it to parametric form.

The ellipse has the equation: (x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4.

The solution has the ellipse parameterized as follows:

x+1 = 2cost and y = sint

Can someone just explain this translation, step by step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parametric form of an arbitrary ellipse is

\begin{align*}<br /> x &amp;= \alpha\cos t + c_x\\ <br /> y &amp;= \beta\sin t + c_y<br /> \end{align*}<br />

where (c_x, c_y) is its center and \alpha,\beta are constants.

How would you use this to convert your equation to parametric form? Can you find values for any of c_x,c_y,\alpha, or \beta right off the bat?
 
well, I assume the center of the ellipse is at (-1,0). Otherwise I am stumped...how do they get 2cost?? And how is y = sint? I am very confused...
 
You know what, I just thought of a better way to do this.

Recall that in parametric form the equation \frac{x^2}{r^2}+\frac{y^2}{r^2}=1 is
\begin{equation}\tag{1}\begin{align*}<br /> x &amp;=r\cos t\\<br /> y &amp;=r\sin t.<br /> \end{align*}\end{equation}<br />​

So, to put your equation
(x+1)^2 + 4y^2 = 4​
into parametric form, we need to first do some sort of substitution of variables to get it to look like the equation of a circle. In other words, we want to find functions f and g such that if
\begin{aligned}<br /> x &amp;= f(u,v)\\<br /> y &amp;= g(u,v)<br /> \end{aligned}​
(for new variables u and v), then
\begin{equation}\tag{2}\frac{u^2}{r^2} + \frac{v^2}{r^2} = 1.\end{equation}​
Once we do so, we can put (2) in parametric form as
\begin{equation}\tag{3}\begin{aligned}<br /> u &amp;= r\cos t\\<br /> v &amp;= r\sin t<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
and then (since u will turn out to only depend on x, and v only on y) we can plug in the inverse substitution of (2) to get the parametrization we want.

Let's start by dividing the equation by 4:
\frac{(x+1)^2}{4}+y^2=1.​
The obvious choice for y is to let y=v\ (=g(u,v)).

x, though, is not quite as simple. However, a major benefit of our choice for y is that since \frac{(x+1)^2}{4} doesn't depend on y, it also doesn't depend on v. Thus, instead of finding a function f(u,v), we just need to find a function f(u)! Additionally, notice that by letting y=u, we have effectively chosen r to be 1. So, to we need to find a function f such that
\frac{(f(u)+1)^2}{4}=\frac{u^2}{1}=u^2.​
Solving, we get
f(u)=2u-1\ (=x).​

So, to consolidate, we have
\begin{equation}\tag{4}\begin{aligned}<br /> x &amp;= 2u-1\\<br /> y &amp;= v.<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
Plugging the inverse substitution
\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}<br /> u &amp;= \frac{x+1}{2}\\<br /> v &amp;= y<br /> \end{aligned}\end{equation}​
(and r=1) into (3), we have
\begin{align*}<br /> \frac{x+1}{2} &amp;= \cos t\\<br /> y &amp;= \sin t<br /> \end{align*}​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K