Understanding the Saddle Point in Griffith's CED Problem 3.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasanhabibul
  • Start date Start date
hasanhabibul
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
can anyone pleasezzzz help me by answering elaborately Problem 3.2 ... ...consider the cubical
arrangement of fixed charges in Fig. 3.4. It looks, off hand, as though a positive charge at
the center would be suspended in midair, since it is repelled away from each corner. Where
is the leak in this "electrostatic bottle"?

why answer of this question is saddle point and the midpoint of the each side of the cube ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have the solution manual ... i have downloaded it form gigapedia...but in the solution manual it did not describe ...only they had given the answer ...can u explain??
 
If you post the actual question, people who don't own a copy of Griffiths might be able to help.

What is the problem actually asking? You will need to make an attempt at solving it before getting help, by the way.
 
if u keep six +q charges in the six corner of a cube ...and keep a +q charge suspended in the midair ...then certainly the chage will leak through the cube ...my question is where is the potantial leakage of the cube for the system...
 
Try calculating the potential at the center of the cube. Then you can calculate it at some other locations near the center, and see where the potential becomes lower.

p.s. it's 8 charges at the corners, isn't it?

EDIT: not sure if this is obvious, but you need to write an expression for the potential to get started.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top