Understanding the Solution for Finding the Sum of Digits of m

Murtuza Tipu
Messages
47
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let m be the number of numbers fromantic the set {1,2,3,...,2014} which can be expressed as difference of squares of two non negative integers. The sum of the digits of m is ...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I got a solution from a magazine but I didn't under stand how it came
Can anyone explain me how it came.
Answer is as follows:
2n+1=(n+1)^2 -n^2
n^3=[n (n+1)/2]^2 - [n (n-1)/2]^2
Therefore m contains all odd numbers and the even numbers 2^3,4^3,8^3,10^3,12^3.
Therefore m=1007+7=1013 with digit sum 5.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Containing all odd numbers is a consequence of the first statement, 2n+1=(n+1)^2 -n^2. This clearly shows that all odd numbers can be created as a difference of squares.
For even numbers, a different identity is used, n^3=[n (n+1)/2]^2 - [n (n-1)/2]^2. This is not necessarily even, but is definitely a difference of square integers.
So it can be concluded that any cubed integer is also in the set.
Looking at the bounds [1,2014], the largest even cube is 12^3 = 1728.
Odd numbers are 2n+1 for n = 0 to 1006, or 1007 in the set.
Even numbers are the cubes of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, or 6 in the set.
This gives 1007+6 = 1013.

The truth of the identities used can be shown through simple expansion.

My question is how can one be sure that other even numbers should be excluded from the set?
 
Oops... think about RUber's question first :-)
##(n+1)^2-n^2=2n+1##
##(n+2)^2-n^2=4n+4=4(n+1)##
Therefore any odd number and any multiple of 4 can be expressed as the difference of two squares.

So m is wrong, and so is the digit sum.
 
Hint: What are the quadratic residues modulo 8?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top