Understanding the Speed of Light: A Thought Experiment

bil.a
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm still really confused about the speed of light. I'm kinda new at this so bear with me. Does the speed of light depend on the frame of reference it is in? For example let's say you have a ball moving at 10m/s in a car moving at 20m/s. This would mean that from the Earth's frame of reference the ball is moving 30m/s.

But what if you had a car moving half the speed of light. And a man in the car fired a light gun traveling at the maximum speed of light. What would the speed of the light from the gun be from the Earth's frame of reference.

Wouldn't it be 1.5 the speed of light? Why or why not is this not possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

bil.a said:
Does the speed of light depend on the frame of reference it is in?

It doesn't. Actually, that is one of the axioms that the whole of special relativity follows from, and it is experimentally verified to great accuracy. That is, in two "equivalent" frames (moving with constant velocity with respect to the other) the speed of light always has some fixed value, c.

Now, when you perform your thought experiment, all kinds of weird stuff follows (like, when you use the light gun in your moving car to construct a clock, it will tick slower to a spectator along the track).
 
hmmm so does this mean that the light fired from the gun will move have a slower time interval once it reaches maximum speed observed from the earth?
 
bil.a said:
hmmm so does this mean that the light fired from the gun will move have a slower time interval once it reaches maximum speed observed from the earth?
Not usre what you mean by a "slower time interval," but a person traveling at enar lightspeed will age more slowly, yes.
 
Also note it doesn't reach its maximum speed. It just always travels at that speed, light is not something that needs to be or even can be "accelerated from rest".

May I ask how your mathematical knowledge is? E.g. what is your level of algebra? Because I have a document that allows you to figure out some of the weirdnesses, starting from basic postulates for yourself. I'm not sure where you are from, but in American terms end-of-high school (~ 16 - 18 years of age) math definitely suffices (as long as you can substitute and simplify fractions, and use a function prescription to sketch a graph and derive basic properties from it.).
 

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'Hawking After 54 Years Confirmed: BH surfaces don't shrink'

Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Did the Michelson-Morley Experiment Disprove the Ether Theory?
Replies
5
Views
1K
B Thought Experiment : Try and get Alice to "0%" the Speed of light
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Information traveling faster than light? (thought experiment)
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Questions on the Michelson Morley Experiment
Replies
47
Views
6K
B Einstein thought experiment confusion: “light clock in a moving frame”
Replies
5
Views
2K
I ##x'=0## and ##t'=0## axes in railcar thought experiment
Replies
25
Views
2K
B Measuring Light Velocity Correctly: Thought Experiment
Replies
28
Views
2K
I Why does laser beam hit the same target when fired?
2
Replies
90
Views
3K
I Faster-than-Light Causality-Flip: Thought Experiment Reference?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Variation of the lightning train thought experiment
Replies
21
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top