Understanding Time Invariance in Signals

AI Thread Summary
Determining time invariance in signals can be challenging, particularly with examples like x[-n]. A key technique is to analyze parameters: if they include a time variable (t), the signal is time variant; if they are constants, the signal is time invariant. In the case of x[-n], applying a delay leads to different outputs, indicating that it is time variant. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the test for time invariance, where the outputs from two paths must be equal for the system to be considered time invariant. Ultimately, the conclusion is that x[-n] is indeed time variant due to the differing results from the delay and system application.
kolycholy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
i usually have such a hard time determining whether a signal is time invariant or not ...

for example, why would x[-n] not be time-invariant?

please don't just tell me why x[-n] would not be time invariant ...
tell me techniques that I can apply to other signals too
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
look at the parameters beside your function if they contain a t term then your signal is time varient while if the parameters are constants then the signal is time invarient.
 
angel23 said:
look at the parameters beside your function if they contain a t term then your signal is time varient while if the parameters are constants then the signal is time invarient.
that makes sense ... but then tell me why x[-n] is not time invariant?
 
do you see any t terms beside the function??
it is time invarient. why r u sure it isn't time invarient?
you can use this site to see the graph for check. http://www.jhu.edu/~signals/sys/resulta939.html

(i used unit step as an example)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
angel23 said:
do you see any t terms beside the function??
it is time invarient. why r u sure it isn't time invarient?
you can use this site to see the graph for check. http://www.jhu.edu/~signals/sys/resulta939.html

(i used unit step as an example)
i am so sure it isn't time invariant, because the solution manual said so ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is 'n'?
 
desA said:
What is 'n'?
n is just time, but it assumes discrete value only
 
So, you've answered your own question.
 
desA said:
So, you've answered your own question.
no i did not ... please enlighten me ...
 
  • #10
i am sure it is time invarient my mind says so.
 
  • #11
The key is in understanding the test for time invariance.

To test: x[n] > DELAY > x[n-n0] > SYSTEM > w[n]
|
>>> SYSTEM > y[n] > DELAY > y[n-n0]

w[n] and y[n-n0] are equal if the system is time invariant

in the case of y[n]=x[-n], for the top approach, delaying the system results in n-n0 then we apply the system's effect of reversing JUST n, so w[n]=x[-n-n0]. With the second path, we apply the system and get y[n]=x[-n] and then apply the delay to get y[n-n0]=x[-(n-n0)]=x[-n+n0].

Since x[-n-n0] is not the same as x[-n+n0] the system is time VARIANT.
 
Back
Top