Understanding Torque in a 2D Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter mybrohshi5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Torque
AI Thread Summary
Torque in a 2D plane can be calculated using the cross product of the position vector and the force vector, defined as t = r x F. The magnitude of torque is determined by the formula, and the direction is based on the right-hand rule, where counterclockwise torques are typically considered positive. When calculating torque about different points, the position vector must be adjusted accordingly, and the resulting torques from each component force should be added algebraically, taking care to adhere to the sign convention. The confusion often arises from whether to add or subtract the torque values, which depends on the chosen convention for positive and negative directions. Understanding these principles clarifies how to approach torque problems effectively.
mybrohshi5
Messages
365
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A force F = 1.90 N i + 2.80 N j is applied at the point x = 2.50 m, y = 0.00 m. Find the torque about the origin.

Homework Equations



t = r*F

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not really understand multiplying vectors in this type of problem.

Can anyone give me a brief explanation of what to do for problems like this.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of the torque, given as a vector product? You have both vectors, so you can calculate the torque.
 
my book says the definition of torque vector is just t = r x F

I get you can you the cross product for i and j but i am a little confused on how to tell the direction.

So for this problem for the magnitude of the torque about the origin would be

1.9(0) - 2.5(2.8) = -7

The direction for the torque for this is in the +z direction. Can you explain to my why that is? i thought it would be -z direction

thanks for the help :)
 
I think i get it a little more now. i am having trouble understanding the next part though.

It asks for the torque about the point x = -1.80 m, y = 2.60 m?

so for my cross product i have (2.5i - (-1.8i + 2.6j) x (1.9i + 2.8j) which equals (4.3i)(2.8j) - (1.9i)(2.6) which therefore equals 7.1 but the answer is 17.0

17 would come from (4.3i)(2.8j) + (1.9i)(2.6)

i don't get why you would add them instead of subtract them?
 
Whether the torque is plus or minus depends on the sign convention you use. If you take counterclockwise torques as negative, then the z axis is positive going into the plane of the page. If you take counterclockwise torques as positive, then the z axis is positive coming out from the plane of the page toward you. By convention, the z axis is usually considered positive coming out from the plane towards you, hence, countrerclockwise torques are positive (right hand rule).
Personally, I despise the cross product definition of torque, and use it only when absolutely necessary. It is often simpler to break the force into its x and y components, then the torque of each component force about the point in question is the component force times the perpendicular distance from the line of action of that force to that pivot point, then just algebraically add up the torques from each force component, ccw is +, and cw is - . In your example, both components produce ccw torques, so they are additive.
 
Thanks Jay that helped so much. You just explained that 100 times better than my professor :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top